Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999884›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

Machine Learning Improves Functional Upper Extremity Use Capture in Distal Radius Fracture Patients.

Sean B Sequeira, Megan L Grainger, Abigail M Mitchell, Cassidy C Anderson, Shashwati Geed, Peter Lum, Aviram M Giladi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sean B SequeiraThe Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Md.
Megan L GraingerMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, D.C.
Abigail M MitchellOrthopedics and Sports Medicine at Lafayette Center, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Cassidy C AndersonMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, D.C.
Shashwati GeedDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.
Peter LumDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C.
Aviram M GiladiThe Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Md.
MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital · USMedStar Union Memorial Hospital · USGeorgetown University · USMedStar Health · USUniversity of America · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current outcome measures, including strength/range of motion testing, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and motor skill testing, may provide inadequate granularity in reflecting functional upper extremity (UE) use after distal radius fracture (DRF) repair. Accelerometry analysis also has shortcomings, namely, an inability to differentiate functional versus nonfunctional movements. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of machine learning (ML) analyses in capturing UE functional movements based on accelerometry data for patients after DRF repair. In this prospective study, six patients were enrolled 2-6 weeks after DRF open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). They all performed standardized activities while wearing a wrist accelerometer, and the data were analyzed by an ML algorithm. These activities were also videotaped and evaluated by visual inspection. Our novel ML algorithm was able to predict from accelerometry data whether the limb was performing a movement rated as functional, with accuracy of 90.4% ± 3.6% for within-subject modeling and 79.8% ± 8.9% accuracy for between-subject modeling. The application of ML algorithms to accelerometry data allowed for capture of functional UE activity in patients after DRF open reduction and internal fixation and accurately predicts functional UE use. Such analyses could improve our understanding of recovery and enhance routine postoperative rehabilitation in DRF patients.

Identifiers

PMID35999884
PMCPMC9390808
OpenAlexW4292209985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.