ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Nasal Tip Depressor Manipulation through Upper Buccal Sulcus Approach in Selected Open Primary Rhinoplasties.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During smiling, the prominent action of nasal tip depressors (NTDs) antagonizes the rhinoplasty nasal tip support maneuvers and favors scarring forces' pulling the nasal tip in a less projecting vector. The NTDs' disinsertion is feasible through the open rhinoplasty approach. Yet, the reliability of the open approach to manipulate all NTD attachments is still questionable. The upper buccal sulcus approach (UBSA) is a reliable approach to manipulate variable anatomy of the NTDs. Methods: Thirty-two patients had primary open rhinoplasty between 2016 and 2020. All patients showed hyperactive NTDs during smile preoperatively. Through UBSA, disruption of NTDs was done. Aesthetic outcome was evaluated by comparing the pre/postoperative nasal tip projection (NTP) and nasolabial angle (NLA) in lateral views. Results: The sample included 28 women and four men, and the mean age was 30.7 years. The mean follow-up period was 23.8 months. Preoperatively, 53% (n = 17) of patients showed normal NTP measurements; this percentage increased to 87.5% (n = 28) postoperatively. The mean NLA for the 32 patients was 91.0 degrees preoperatively' which was increased to 102.5 degrees postoperatively. These aesthetic results were maintained throughout the follow-up period' with no significant increase in the incidence of complications. Conclusions: The combination of the UBSA with open rhinoplasty resulted in objective visualization and manipulation of the NTDs. This was proven by the maintained NTP and NLA in aesthetic optimum values throughout the follow-up period. We believe that UBSA can be safely combined with open rhinoplasty as a reliable hidden approach to manipulate hyperactive NTD cases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.