Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999560›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2022

The perspectives of oncology healthcare providers on the role of palliative care in a comprehensive cancer center.

Trenley M Anderson, Megan M Farrell, Gabriel Moss, Mona Gupta, Stefanie Mooney, Katherine Daunov, Megan Savernick, Jan Frandsen, Kolby Verrona, Aryn Pecoraro and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Trenley M AndersonCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Megan M FarrellCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Gabriel MossCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mona GuptaCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Stefanie MooneyCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Katherine DaunovUniversity Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Megan SavernickUniversity Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jan FrandsenUniversity Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kolby VerronaUniversity Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Aryn PecoraroUniversity Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cassandra ManceUniversity Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jorge GarciaCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Richard T LeeCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. RichLee@CoH.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative care (PC) is an essential part of oncologic care, but its optimal role within a cancer center remains unclear. This study examines oncology healthcare providers' perspectives about the role of PC at a comprehensive cancer center (CCC).

methodsPhysicians, nurses, and other oncology healthcare providers at a CCC were surveyed for their opinions about the role of inpatient and outpatient PC, preferences for PC services, and barriers to referral. Chi-squared tests and multiple regression analyses were performed to explore associations.

resultsWe received 137/221 completed questionnaires (61% response rate). Respondents were generally female (78%), had ≤ 10 years of service (69%), and included physicians (32%), nurses (32%), and advanced practice providers (17%). Most respondents (82%) agreed that more patients could benefit from PC. They also agreed that PC is beneficial for both outpatient and inpatient management of complex pain (96 and 88%), complex symptoms (84 and 74%), and advanced cancer patients (80 and 64%). Transition to hospice (64 vs. 42%, p = 0.007) and goals of care (62 vs. 49%, p = 0.011) provided by PC services were more valued by respondents for the inpatient than for the outpatient setting. Barriers to utilizing PC included lack of availability, unsure of when to refer, and poor communication. The majority of respondents (83%) preferred a cancer focused PC team to provide high-quality care.

conclusionsOverall, the majority of oncology health care providers believe that more patients could benefit from PC, but opinions vary regarding the roles of inpatient and outpatient PC. Barriers and areas for improvement include availability, referral process, and improved communication.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingHospice CareNeoplasmsPhysiciansFemaleHumansMedical OncologyPalliative CareBarriersInpatientOncologyOutpatientPalliative careSurvey

Identifiers

PMID35999560
PMCPMC9400235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.