Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999539›Full record

ReviewBMC medicine2022

Tailoring cultural offers to meet the needs of older people during uncertain times: a rapid realist review.

Stephanie Tierney, Sebastien Libert, Jordan Gorenberg, Geoff Wong, Amadea Turk, Kerryn Husk, Helen J Chatterjee, Kathryn Eccles, Caroline Potter, Emma Webster and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding and Improving Older People's Well-Being through Social Prescribing Involving the Cultural Sector: Interviews from a Realist Evaluation.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie TierneyUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK. stephanie.tierney@phc.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2155-2440
Sebastien LibertUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Jordan GorenbergUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Geoff WongUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Amadea TurkUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Kerryn HuskUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Helen J ChatterjeeUniversity College London, London, UK.
Kathryn EcclesUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Caroline PotterUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Emma WebsterUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Beth McDougallUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Harriet WarburtonUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Lucy ShawUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Nia RobertsUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Kamal R MahtaniUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK. kamal.mahtani@phc.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-medical issues (e.g. loneliness, financial concerns, housing problems) can shape how people feel physically and psychologically. This has been emphasised during the Covid-19 pandemic, especially for older people. Social prescribing is proposed as a means of addressing non-medical issues, which can include drawing on support offered by the cultural sector.

methodA rapid realist review was conducted to explore how the cultural sector (in particular public/curated gardens, libraries and museums), as part of social prescribing, can support the holistic well-being of older people under conditions imposed by the pandemic. An initial programme theory was developed from our existing knowledge and discussions with cultural sector staff. It informed searches on databases and within the grey literature for relevant documents, which were screened against the review's inclusion criteria. Data were extracted from these documents to develop context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs). We used the CMOCs to refine our initial programme theory.

resultsData were extracted from 42 documents. CMOCs developed from these documents highlighted the importance of tailoring-shaping support available through the cultural sector to the needs and expectations of older people-through messaging, matching, monitoring and partnerships. Tailoring can help to secure benefits that older people may derive from engaging with a cultural offer-being distracted (absorbed in an activity) or psychologically held, making connections or transforming through self-growth. We explored the idea of tailoring in more detail by considering it in relation to Social Exchange Theory.

conclusionsTailoring cultural offers to the variety of conditions and circumstances encountered in later life, and to changes in social circumstances (e.g. a global pandemic), is central to social prescribing for older people involving the cultural sector. Adaptations should be directed towards achieving key benefits for older people who have reported feeling lonely, anxious and unwell during the pandemic and recovery from it.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAgedHumansUncertaintyCOVID-19Cultural sectorOlder peopleRealist reviewSocial prescribingWell-being

Identifiers

PMID35999539
PMCPMC9398500
OpenAlexW4293025106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.