Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999444›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Stone tools differences across three capuchin monkey populations: food's physical properties, ecology, and culture.

Tiago Falótico, Tatiane Valença, Michele P Verderane, Mariana D Fogaça

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tiago FalóticoSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, Av. Arlindo Bettio, 1000, Prédio CMP1, Sala T6, São Paulo, SP, 03828-000, Brazil. tfalotico@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0638-1989
Tatiane ValençaSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, Av. Arlindo Bettio, 1000, Prédio CMP1, Sala T6, São Paulo, SP, 03828-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3618-4633
Michele P VerderaneNeotropical Primates Research Group, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8467-8385
Mariana D FogaçaNeotropical Primates Research Group, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6776-9389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust capuchin monkeys (Sapajus) are known for processing mechanically challenging foods, having morphological adaptations to do so. However, several populations go beyond body limitations by using stone tools to expand their food range. Those populations use stones in a variety of ways, goals, and with different frequencies. Stone tool size correlates with the food's resistance within some populations. However, we have no detailed comparisons to identify if this correlation is the same across populations. This study described and compared stone raw material availability, food's physical properties (hardness and elasticity), and stone tool weight in three populations of bearded capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus), including a newly described site (Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park, CVNP). The differences we observed regarding stone tool weight selection among sites were not correlated to the food's physical properties we analyzed. Lithic resource availability could partly explain some differences in the stone tools used. However, the tool weight differences are larger than the raw material variance across sites, meaning some distinctions are possible behavioral traditions, such as the same fruit (Hymenaea) being processed with bigger than needed tools in CVNP than in the other two sites. Capuchin monkey behavioral variability in stone tool use can be caused by several interacting factors, from ecological to cultural.

Indexed as

CebinaeTool Use BehaviorAnimalsCebusFruit

Identifiers

PMID35999444
PMCPMC9399116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.