Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999434›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022

Intrathecal therapy for the management of leptomeningeal metastatic disease: a scoping review of the current literature and ongoing clinical trials.

Paolo Palmisciano, Gina Watanabe, Andie Conching, Christian Ogasawara, Morana Vojnic, Randy S D'Amico

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Paolo PalmiscianoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. paolo.palmisciano94@gmail.com.
Gina WatanabeJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University Oh Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Andie ConchingJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University Oh Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Christian OgasawaraDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Morana VojnicDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Randy S D'AmicoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USLenox Hill Hospital · USNorthwell Health · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLeptomeningeal metastatic disease (LMD) from advanced malignancies has poor prognoses and limited treatments. Intrathecal therapy (ITT) protocols are available, showing variable outcomes. We reviewed the therapeutic and toxicity profiles of ITT in LMD.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web-of-Science, and Scopus were searched following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to include studies reporting ITT for LMD. CLINICALTRIAL: gov and Cochrane were searched to identify ongoing clinical trials.

resultsWe included 27 published studies encompassing 2161 patients and 4 ongoing trials. LMD originated from brain metastases (85.5%), lymphomas (5.4%), high-grade gliomas (4.6%), medulloblastomas (2.3%), and leukemias (2.1%). LMD was mostly diagnosed with the co-presence of neurological-related symptoms and positive imaging and/or cerebrospinal fluid cytology (60.8%). The most common ITT agents were methotrexate (35.9%), cytarabine (21.9%), and thiotepa (8.2%), standalone or combined. Patients received a median of 6.5 ITT cycles (range, 1.0-71.0) via intraventricular (58.8%) or lumbar intrathecal (41.2%) routes. The Ommaya reservoir was implanted in 38.5% cases. Concurrent systemic chemotherapy (45.2%) and/or radiotherapy (30.6%) were used. After 1-3 cycles, 44.7% patients had improved clinical status and 29.9% converted into negative cerebrospinal fluid cytology. The most common ITT-related severe adverse events were neutropenia (6.5%), meningitis (5.2%) and encephalopathy (4.5%). Median freedom from progression was 2.4 months (range, 0.1-59.5) and median overall survival 5.5 months (range, 0.1-148.0).

conclusionCurrent ITT protocols are variable but effective and well-tolerated in LMD. Ongoing trials are investigating dose-limiting toxicity profiles and long-term overall survival. Future studies should analyze the therapeutic and safety profiles of ITT compared to newer systemic therapies.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMeningeal CarcinomatosisMeningeal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCytarabineHumansImmunotherapyCytarabineBrain metastasesChemotherapyIntrathecal therapyLeptomeningeal metastasesOmmaya reservoir

Identifiers

PMID35999434
OpenAlexW4292800784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.