Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999428›Full record

Observational studyClinical drug investigation2022

Active Safety Surveillance of Four Types of COVID-19 Vaccines: A National Study from Jordan.

Derar H Abdel-Qader, Hasan Abdel-Qader, Jennifer Silverthorne, Chuenjid Kongkaew, Ahmad Z Al Meslamani, Wail Hayajneh, Osama M Abu Ata, Walid Shnaigat, Salah AbuRuz, Mohannad Al Nsour and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical drug investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 14 institutions in 5 countries.

Derar H Abdel-QaderFaculty of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan. D.balawi@igec.com.au.
Hasan Abdel-QaderMinistry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
Jennifer SilverthorneDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Chuenjid KongkaewDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Ahmad Z Al MeslamaniAAU Health and Biomedical Research Center, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Wail HayajnehSchool of Medicine, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Osama M Abu AtaKing Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
Walid ShnaigatAl Rashid Hospital Center, Amman, Jordan.
Salah AbuRuzDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, The United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Mohannad Al NsourEastern Mediterranean Public Health Network (EMPHNET), Amman, Jordan.
Abdallah AlhaririFourth Generation for Medical Laboratory, Amman, Jordan.
Khaldoun ShnewerFourth Generation for Medical Laboratory, Amman, Jordan.
Mohammad Da'ssanFourth Generation for Medical Laboratory, Amman, Jordan.
Nathir M ObeidatFourth Generation for Medical Laboratory, Amman, Jordan.
Khaldoon E NusairKing Abdullah University Hospital, Irbid, Jordan.
Mothafer S JalamdehPrince Hamza Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Feras HawariMinistry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
Khaldoun KhaderMinistry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
Tareq HakimMinistry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
Fatima A HammadMinistry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
Mustafa Al QudahMinistry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
Mohammad AsadEastern Mediterranean Public Health Network (EMPHNET), Amman, Jordan.
Ministry of Health · JOMédecins Sans Frontières · JOEastern Mediterranean Public Health Network · JOAl Ain University · AEJordan Hospital · JOJordan University of Science and Technology · JOKing Abdullah University Hospital · JOKing Hussein Cancer Center · JONaresuan University · THPetra University · JOThe Farah Hospital · JOUnited Arab Emirates University · AEUniversity of Jordan · JOUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Smart Labs Group No NumberUniversity of Petra. No Number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19), Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV), and Sputnik V coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been granted emergency approval in many nations, their safety has never been studied and compared in one community-based study. This study aimed to investigate and compare the incidence, nature, severity, and predictors of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) with COVID-19 vaccines.

methodThis was a prospective observational study conducted in Jordan between 1 January and 21 September 2021. A team of pharmacists and nurses (n = 407) collected the local and systemic AEFIs of four COVID-19 vaccines by prospectively contacting participants registered in the national vaccination program platform. A red-flag technology was inserted to classify and track rare and serious AEFIs.

resultsThis study included 658,428 participants who were vaccinated with 1,032,430 doses; 610,591, 279,606, 140,843, and 1390 participants received the first and second doses of the BNT162b2, BBIBP-CorV, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and Sputnik V vaccines, respectively. The overall incidence of AEFIs was 28.8%, and the overall rates of systemic, local, and immediate hypersensitivity AEFIs were 22.2%, 18.8%, and 0.5%, respectively. The highest proportions of immediate hypersensitivity AEFIs and systemic AEFIs were reported after administration of the Sputnik V vaccine and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 first dose, respectively. The most severe AEFIs were reported after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 first dose and BNT162b2 second dose. The hospitalization and mortality rates after vaccination were 20 in 10,000 and 1 in 10,000, respectively. Based on red-flag tracking, the top three outcome events were lymphadenopathy (157.9/100,000), anxiety disorders (136.6/100,000), and lower respiratory tract infection (100.9/100,000), with Guillain-Barré syndrome (1.8/100,000), vasculitis (3.0/100,000), and myopericarditis (4.8/100,000) being the least common.

conclusionThe incidence rates of local, systemic, and immediate hypersensitivity AEFIs of four COVID-19 vaccines occur frequently. High incidence rates of rare and serious AEFIs were reported in this study. Younger participants, females, those who had previously had COVID-19, and smokers were more likely to encounter AEFIs.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHypersensitivity, ImmediateAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19FemaleHumansJordanVaccinationVaccinesBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35999428
PMCPMC9398044
OpenAlexW4292787473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.