Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999351›Full record

SynthesisEuropean geriatric medicine2022

Systematic review of measurement properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in geriatric rehabilitation.

Margot W M de Waal, Miriam L Haaksma, Arno J Doornebosch, Rimmie Meijs, Wilco P Achterberg

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European geriatric medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Interrater Reliability of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Within Geriatric Rehabilitation.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frailty and innovative participatory rehabilitation.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margot W M de WaalUniversity Network for the Care Sector Zuid-Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. m.w.m.de_waal@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5898-7448
Miriam L HaaksmaUniversity Network for the Care Sector Zuid-Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arno J DoorneboschUniversity Network for the Care Sector Zuid-Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rimmie MeijsTopaz Revitel, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wilco P AchterbergUniversity Network for the Care Sector Zuid-Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is used to inventory problems experienced by the patient to set goals and evaluate treatment. We aimed to make a systematic overview of measurement properties for people in geriatric rehabilitation.

methodsSeven electronic databases were searched for psychometric studies investigating content validity, construct validity, responsiveness, or reliability of the COPM in geriatric rehabilitation populations aged ≥ 60 years. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed methodological quality from included studies.

resultsOf 292 identified articles, 13 studies were included. The COPM showed good test-retest reliability (two studies), moderate inter-rater reliability (one study), and good content validity (one study with some risk of bias). Four studies with minimal risk of bias showed good construct validity as their hypotheses were confirmed. Responsiveness was moderate in three studies with adequate methodological quality.

conclusionAll measurement properties have been studied in geriatric rehabilitation populations, and indicate that the COPM gives relevant information for geriatric rehabilitation, and scores can be assessed reliably and are responsive to change. Although there were many studies on construct validity, authors had different opinions on what exactly COPM-scores tell us, as they used a variety of comparator instruments and different hypotheses. Consensus on exact interpretation of the scores is needed.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapyAgedCanadaHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsAgedCOPMGeriatric rehabilitationReliabilityResponsivenessValidity

Identifiers

PMID35999351
PMCPMC9722840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.