Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999292›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2022

Oncofetal reprogramming in tumour development and progression.

Ankur Sharma, Camille Blériot, Jennifer Currenti, Florent Ginhoux

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Ankur SharmaHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia. ankur.sharma@perkins.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-136X
Camille BlériotINSERM U1015, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Jennifer CurrentiHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4609-587X
Florent GinhouxINSERM U1015, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. florent_ginhoux@immunol.a-star.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2857-7755
Inserm · FRAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGCurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic development is characterized by rapidly dividing cells, cellular plasticity and a highly vascular microenvironment. These features are similar to those of tumour tissue, in that malignant cells are characterized by their ability to proliferate and exhibit cellular plasticity. The tumour microenvironment also often includes immunosuppressive features. Reciprocal communication between various cellular subpopulations enables fetal and tumour tissues to proliferate, migrate and escape immune responses. Fetal-like reprogramming has been demonstrated in the tumour microenvironment, indicating extraordinary cellular plasticity and bringing an additional layer of cellular heterogeneity. More importantly, some of these features are also present during inflammation. This Perspective discusses the similarity between embryogenesis, inflammation and tumorigenesis, and describes the mechanisms of oncofetal reprogramming that enable tumour cells to escape from immune responses, promoting tumour growth and metastasis.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisCell PlasticityHumansInflammationTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35999292
OpenAlexW4292801209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.