Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999280›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Explosive hamstrings strength asymmetry persists despite maximal hamstring strength recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts.

Argell T San Jose, Nirav Maniar, Ryan G Timmins, Kate Beerworth, Chris Hampel, Natalie Tyson, Morgan D Williams, David A Opar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Argell T San JoseSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. argelljoseph.sanjose@myacu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5603-331X
Nirav ManiarSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6180-6003
Ryan G TimminsSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-1848
Kate BeerworthWakefield Sports and Exercise Medicine Clinic, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Chris HampelWakefield Sports and Exercise Medicine Clinic, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Natalie TysonWakefield Sports and Exercise Medicine Clinic, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Morgan D WilliamsSchool of Health, Sport and Professional Practice, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, Wales, UK.
David A OparSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8354-6353
Australian Catholic University · AUWakefield Orthopaedic Clinic · AUAlbion Centre · AUUniversity of South Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the differences in maximal (isometric and concentric peak torque) and explosive (rate of torque development (RTD)) hamstring and quadriceps strength symmetry between males and females during early- and late-phase rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hamstring tendon (HT) autografts and to determine the interaction of time and sex on maximal and explosive strength symmetry.

methodsA total of 38 female and 51 male participants were assessed during early (3-6 months post-operative) and late (7-12 months post-operative) phases of rehabilitation following ACLR. Maximal (concentric and isometric peak torque) and explosive (isometric RTD) hamstring and quadriceps strength were assessed and presented as limb symmetry index (LSI).

resultsMaximal concentric hamstrings asymmetry (Early: 86 ± 14; Late 92 ± 13; p = 0.005) as well as maximal concentric (Early, 73 ± 15; Late 91 ± 12; p < 0.001) and explosive (Early: 82 ± 30; Late: 92 ± 25; p = 0.03) quadriceps asymmetry decreased from early to late rehabilitation. However, there were no significant changes in maximal isometric quadriceps strength and explosive isometric hamstring strength in the same time period. Females had a larger asymmetry in maximal concentric (Females: 75 ± 17; Males: 81 ± 15; p = 0.001) and explosive (Females: 81 ± 32; Males: 89 ± 25; p = 0.01) quadriceps strength than males throughout rehabilitation. There were no sex differences in maximal and explosive hamstring strength. There were no sex by time interactions for any variables.

conclusionExplosive hamstring strength asymmetry did not improve despite recovery of maximal hamstring strength during rehabilitation following ACLR with HT autografts. While sex did not influence strength recovery, females had larger maximal and explosive quadriceps strength asymmetry compared to males throughout rehabilitation following ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionHamstring MusclesHamstring TendonsAutograftsFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthQuadriceps MuscleAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionHamstringQuadricepsRate of torque developmentStrength

Identifiers

PMID35999280
PMCPMC9859849
OpenAlexW4292801186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.