ArticleScientific reports2022
Pollution and risk assessment of heavy metals in rivers in the antimony capital of Xikuangshan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heavy metal pollution and health risk assessment in surface waters impacted by pharmaceutical effluents in Gazipur and Narayanganj, Bangladesh.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Heavy metal accumulation risk and source analysis in soils of antimony mining areas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating land degradation and environmental hazards in North delta Egypt using machine learning and GIS approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Spatial-temporal variations of river water quality under human-induced land use changes in large river basins.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hydro-chemical profiling and contaminant source identification in agricultural canals using data driven clustering approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Determination of leachate leakage around a valley type landfill and its pollution and risk on groundwater.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Spatial distribution of health risk assessment of a drinking water reservoir exposed to urban agglomeration and industrial lead contamination in Istanbul, Türkiye.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025Article
- Study on immobilization of composite pollutants in antimony mining areas by target-enriched sulfate-reducing bacteria from antimony tailings.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Exploring the feasibility of Zr-based metal-organic frameworks for the recovery of Sb (V) and Sb (III) from mining waste.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Occurrence, distribution, source apportionment, ecological and health risk assessment of heavy metals in water, sediment, fish and prawn from Ojo River in Lagos, Nigeria.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2024Article
- A Diamond/Graphene/Diamond Electrode for Waste Water Treatment.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Xikuangshan (XKS) is the world's largest antimony mining region, and its exploitation for hundreds of years has also resulted in serious soil erosion, fragile ecology, contaminated water, and shortage water. Through systematic and scientific collection samples from the rivers in XKS, the Nemerow index (NI), modified heavy metal pollution index (m-HPI), ecological risk index, and health risk indexeswere used to evaluate and analyze the water quality, pollution levels and risks of heavy metals (Sb, As, Mn, Pb, Zn, Hg, Cd) to ecology and humans in XKS. The results showed that the average concentrations of TN, TP, Sb, As and Hg in surface water were 0.48 mg/L (0-4.34 mg/L), 2.58 mg/L (0-4.34 mg/L), 1.05 mg/L (0.0009-5.33 mg/L), 1.06 mg/L (BDL-19.60 mg/L) and 0.00084 mg/L (LDBL-0.0036 mg/L), respectively, exceeding the limits of the Chinese surface water quality standards. Based on the m-HPI method, only 8.57% of the sampling points are classified as the worst water quality. However, according to the NI method, about 7.14% and 87.16% of the sampling points in the study area are moderately and severely polluted, respectively. The results of heavy metal pollution based on the NI evaluation is were more serious than that on the m-HPI method. The values of ecological risk assessment varied from 22.69 to 7351.20, revealed that heavy metals pose a very serious risk to the surface water ecosystem at more than 50% of the sampling sites, and Sb and As are the main pollutants, followed by Hg. The total non-carcinogenic risk index (TCR) for adults and children were 47.70 and 90.10 respectively, Sb and As is the main non-carcinogenic risk factor. For adults and children, the average carcinogenic risk (CR) of As was 6.49 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.