Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999239›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

De novo protein design of photochemical reaction centers.

Nathan M Ennist, Zhenyu Zhao, Steven E Stayrook, Bohdana M Discher, P Leslie Dutton, Christopher C Moser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. An expandable, modular de novo protein platform for precision redox engineering.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Research square · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan M EnnistDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6058, USA. ennist@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4823-9497
Zhenyu ZhaoDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6058, USA.
Steven E StayrookDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6058, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1677-8293
Bohdana M DischerDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6058, USA.
P Leslie DuttonDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6058, USA.
Christopher C MoserDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6058, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Washington · USYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural photosynthetic protein complexes capture sunlight to power the energetic catalysis that supports life on Earth. Yet these natural protein structures carry an evolutionary legacy of complexity and fragility that encumbers protein reengineering efforts and obfuscates the underlying design rules for light-driven charge separation. De novo development of a simplified photosynthetic reaction center protein can clarify practical engineering principles needed to build new enzymes for efficient solar-to-fuel energy conversion. Here, we report the rational design, X-ray crystal structure, and electron transfer activity of a multi-cofactor protein that incorporates essential elements of photosynthetic reaction centers. This highly stable, modular artificial protein framework can be reconstituted in vitro with interchangeable redox centers for nanometer-scale photochemical charge separation. Transient absorption spectroscopy demonstrates Photosystem II-like tyrosine and metal cluster oxidation, and we measure charge separation lifetimes exceeding 100 ms, ideal for light-activated catalysis. This de novo-designed reaction center builds upon engineering guidelines established for charge separation in earlier synthetic photochemical triads and modified natural proteins, and it shows how synthetic biology may lead to a new generation of genetically encoded, light-powered catalysts for solar fuel production.

Indexed as

PhotosynthesisSolar EnergyOxidation-ReductionPhotosystem II Protein ComplexSunlightPhotosystem II Protein Complex

Identifiers

PMID35999239
PMCPMC9399245
OpenAlexW4292707624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.