ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2022
Long-term modulation of the axonal refractory period.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulation of Sensory Input to the Spinal Cord by Peripheral Afferent Fibres via GABAergic Astrocytes.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Long-term modulation of the axonal refractory period.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main question addressed in this study was whether the refractoriness of nerve fibres can be modulated by their depolarisation and, if so, whether depolarisation of nerve fibres evokes a long-term decrease in the duration of the refractory period as well as the previously demonstrated increase in their excitability. This was investigated on nerve fibres within the dorsal columns, dorsal roots and peripheral nerves in deeply anaesthetised rats in vivo. The results revealed major differences depending on the sites of fibre stimulation and polarisation. Firstly, the relative refractory period was found to be shorter in epidurally stimulated dorsal column fibres than in fibres stimulated at other sites. Secondly, the minimal effective interstimulus intervals reflecting the absolute refractory period were likewise shorter for nerve fibres within the dorsal columns even though action potentials evoked by the second of a pair of stimuli were similarly delayed with respect to the preceding action potentials at all the stimulation sites. Thirdly, the minimal interstimulus intervals were reduced by epidurally applied cathodal direct current polarisation but not at other stimulation sites. Consequently, higher proportions of dorsal column fibres could be excited at higher frequencies, especially following their depolarisation, at interstimulus intervals as short as 0.5-0.7 ms. The results demonstrate that epidural depolarisation results in long-lasting effects not only on the excitability but also on the refractoriness of dorsal column fibres. They also provide further evidence for specific features of afferent fibres traversing the dorsal columns previously linked to properties of their branching regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.