ArticleBMJ open2022
Protocol for a collaborative randomised effectiveness trial of lay-delivered versus clinician-delivered behavioural activation in senior centres.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04621877 (Lay-Delivered Behavioral Activation in Senior Centers), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Lay-Delivered Behavioral Activation in Senior Centers
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-level stakeholder perspectives on barriers and facilitators to engaging older adult cancer survivors in mental health treatment.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Designing Implementation Strategies for Lay-Delivered Depression Care: Senior Center Organizational Perspectives From A Multi-Site Randomized Clinical Trial.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry. Open science, education, and practice · 2025Article
- Older Adult Volunteers' Experiences Delivering a Lay-Led Behavioral Activation Program for Depression Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Mixed Methods Study.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry. Open science, education, and practice · 2025Article
- The Promise of Peer-Led Interventions for Older Adults.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDepression is common among community-dwelling older adults who make use of senior centre services yet remains undertreated due to a lack of acceptable and available treatments. Emerging evidence suggests that lay health providers can offer psychosocial interventions for mental health disorders experienced by older adults. We developed a streamlined Behavioural Activation intervention (called 'Do More, Feel Better'; DMFB) to be delivered by older adult volunteers and propose to compare its effectiveness to that of clinician-delivered behavioural activation (BA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a type I collaborative randomised effectiveness trial testing the effect of DMFB in comparison to BA among 288 senior centre clients (aged 60+). Participant clients will be recruited from 6 Seattle, 6 New York City and 6 Tampa area senior centres serving economically and ethnically diverse communities. Primary outcomes will be increased activity level (target) and decreased depressive symptoms. Secondary outcomes will be functioning and client satisfaction, and an exploratory outcome will be treatment fidelity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received ethics approval from the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (STUDY00011434). Client, volunteer and clinician participants will all provide informed consent for study procedures through in-person or remote contact with investigators. Results of this study will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at professional conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04621877; ClinicalTrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.