Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35998173›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Proteome and morphological analysis show unexpected differences between promastigotes of Leishmania amazonensis PH8 and LV79 strains.

Fabia Tomie Tano, Gustavo Rolim Barbosa, Eloiza de Rezende, Rodolpho Ornitz Oliveira Souza, Sandra Marcia Muxel, Ariel Mariano Silber, Giuseppe Palmisano, Beatriz Simonsen Stolf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. LABCG1 AffectsACS infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Surface enolase is a virulence factor ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Phenotypical Differences betweenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabia Tomie TanoDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Rolim BarbosaDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eloiza de RezendeDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodolpho Ornitz Oliveira SouzaDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1215-8553
Sandra Marcia MuxelDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ariel Mariano SilberDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4528-4732
Giuseppe PalmisanoDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Beatriz Simonsen StolfDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7661-3311
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P027989/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeishmaniases are diseases caused by Leishmania protozoans that affect around 12 million people. Leishmania promastigotes are transmitted to vertebrates by female phlebotomine flies during their blood meal. Parasites attach to phagocytic cells, are phagocytosed and differentiate into amastigotes. We previously showed that PH8 and LV79 strains of Leishmania amazonensis have different virulence in mice and that their amastigotes differ in their proteomes. In this work, we compare promastigotes' infectivity in macrophages, their proteomes and morphologies. METHODS/PRINCIPAL

findingsPhagocytosis assays showed that promastigotes adhesion to and phagocytosis by macrophages is higher in PH8 than LV79. To identify proteins that differ between the two strains and that may eventually contribute for these differences we used a label-free proteomic approach to compare promastigote´s membrane-enriched fractions. Proteomic analysis enabled precise discrimination of PH8 and LV79 protein profiles and the identification of several differentially abundant proteins. The proteins more abundant in LV79 promastigotes participate mainly in translation and amino acid and nucleotide metabolism, while the more abundant in PH8 are involved in carbohydrate metabolism, cytoskeleton composition and vesicle/membrane trafficking. Interestingly, although the virulence factor GP63 was more abundant in the less virulent LV79 strain, zymography suggests a higher protease activity in PH8. Enolase, which may be related to virulence, was more abundant in PH8 promastigotes. Unexpectedly, flow cytometry and morphometric analysis indicate higher abundance of metacyclics in LV79. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Proteome comparison of PH8 and LV79 promastigotes generated a list of differential proteins, some of which may be further prospected to affect the infectivity of promastigotes. Although proteomic profile of PH8 includes more proteins characteristic of metacyclics, flow cytometry and morphometric analysis indicate a higher abundance of metacyclics in LV79 cultures. These results shed light to the gaps in our knowledge of metacyclogenesis in L. amazonensis, and to proteins that should be studied in the context of infection by this species.

Indexed as

LeishmaniaLeishmania mexicanaAnimalsFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CProteomeProteomicsProteome

Identifiers

PMID35998173
PMCPMC9398010
OpenAlexW4292847736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.