Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35998133›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Skeletal age assessed by TW2 using 20-bone, carpal and RUS score systems: Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement among male pubertal soccer players.

Paulo Sousa-E-Silva, Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva, Andre Seabra, Daniela C Costa, Diogo V Martinho, João P Duarte, Tomás Oliveira, João Gonçalves-Santos, Inês Rodrigues, Luis P Ribeiro and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Paulo Sousa-E-SilvaUniversity of Coimbra, FCDEF, Coimbra, Portugal.
Manuel J Coelho-E-SilvaUniversity of Coimbra, FCDEF, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4512-7331
Andre SeabraPortugal Football School, Portuguese Football Federation, Lisbon Portugal.
Daniela C CostaUniversity of Coimbra, FCDEF, Coimbra, Portugal.
Diogo V MartinhoUniversity of Coimbra, FCDEF, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0825-4032
João P DuarteUniversity of Coimbra, FCDEF, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7536-9780
Tomás OliveiraUniversity of Coimbra, CIDAF, Coimbra, Portugal.
João Gonçalves-SantosUniversity of Coimbra, CIDAF, Coimbra, Portugal.
Inês RodriguesUniversity of Coimbra, CIDAF, Coimbra, Portugal.
Luis P RibeiroUniversity of Coimbra, CIDAF, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6967-0534
António J FigueiredoUniversity of Coimbra, FCDEF, Coimbra, Portugal.
Jan M KonarskiPoznań University of Physical Education, Theory of Sports Department (Sport Science), Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1861-6201
Sean P CummingDepartment of Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Robert M MalinaDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
University of Coimbra · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity School of Physical Education in Kraków · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine intra- and inter-observer agreement for the three skeletal ages derived from the TW2 method among male pubertal soccer players. The sample included 142 participants aged 11.0-15.3 years. Films of the left hand-wrist were evaluated twice by each of two observers. Twenty bones were rated and three scoring systems used to determine SA adopting the TW2 version: 20-bone, CARPAL and RUS. Overall agreement rates were 95.1% and 93.8% for, respectively, Observer A and Observer B. Although, agreement rates between observers differed for 13 bones (5 carpals, metacarpal-I, metacarpal-III, metacarpal-V, proximal phalanges-I, III and V, distal phalanx-III), intra-class correlationa were as follows: 0.990 (20-bone), 0.969 (CARPAL), and 0.988 (RUS). For the three SA protocols, BIAS was negligible: 0.02 years (20-bone), 0.04 years (CARPAL), and 0.03 years (RUS). Observer-associated error was not significant for 20-bone SA (TEM = 0.25 years, %CV = 1.86) neither RUS SA (TEM = 0.31 years, %CV = 2.22). Although the mean difference for CARPAL SAs between observers (observer A: 12.48±1.18 years; observer B: 12.29±1.24 years; t = 4.662, p<0.01), the inter-observer disagreement had little impact (TEM: 0.34 years: %CV: 2.78). The concordance between bone-specific developmental stages seemed was somewhat more problematic for the carpals than for the long bones. Finally, when error due to the observer is not greater than one stage and the replicated assignments had equal probability for being lower or higher compared to initial assignments, the effect on SAs was trivial or small.

Indexed as

Carpal BonesFinger PhalangesSoccerAge Determination by SkeletonBone DevelopmentHumansMaleObserver Variation

Identifiers

PMID35998133
PMCPMC9397866
OpenAlexW4292767230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.