Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35998110›Full record

Trial reportSleep2022

Melatonin suppression does not automatically alter sleepiness, vigilance, sensory processing, or sleep.

Christine Blume, Maria Niedernhuber, Manuel Spitschan, Helen C Slawik, Martin P Meyer, Tristan A Bekinschtein, Christian Cajochen

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Delayed, Reduced, and Redundant: Information Processing of Prediction Errors during Human Sleep.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Christine BlumeCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland (institution, where the work was performed).ORCID 0000-0003-2328-9612
Maria NiedernhuberConsciousness and Cognition Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4459-6796
Manuel SpitschanCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland (institution, where the work was performed).ORCID 0000-0002-8572-9268
Helen C SlawikPsychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Martin P MeyerPsychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8041-5884
Tristan A BekinschteinConsciousness and Cognition Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5501-8628
Christian CajochenCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland (institution, where the work was performed).ORCID 0000-0003-2699-7171
University of Basel · CHUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 4243Austrian Science Fund FWF J-4243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presleep exposure to short-wavelength light suppresses melatonin and decreases sleepiness with activating effects extending to sleep. This has mainly been attributed to melanopic effects, but mechanistic insights are missing. Thus, we investigated whether two light conditions only differing in the melanopic effects (123 vs. 59 lx melanopic EDI) differentially affect sleep besides melatonin. Additionally, we studied whether the light differentially modulates sensory processing during wakefulness and sleep. Twenty-nine healthy volunteers (18-30 years, 15 women) were exposed to two metameric light conditions (high- vs. low-melanopic, ≈60 photopic lx) for 1 h ending 50 min prior to habitual bed time. This was followed by an 8-h sleep opportunity with polysomnography. Objective sleep measurements were complemented by self-report. Salivary melatonin, subjective sleepiness, and behavioral vigilance were sampled at regular intervals. Sensory processing was evaluated during light exposure and sleep on the basis of neural responses related to violations of expectations in an oddball paradigm. We observed suppression of melatonin by ≈14% in the high- compared to the low-melanopic condition. However, conditions did not differentially affect sleep, sleep quality, sleepiness, or vigilance. A neural mismatch response was evident during all sleep stages, but not differentially modulated by light. Suppression of melatonin by light targeting the melanopic system does not automatically translate to acutely altered levels of vigilance or sleepiness or to changes in sleep, sleep quality, or basic sensory processing. Given contradicting earlier findings and the retinal anatomy, this may suggest that an interaction between melanopsin and cone-rod signals needs to be considered. Clinical Trial Registry: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00023602, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00023602.

Indexed as

MelatoninWakefulnessCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansLightPerceptionSleepSleepinessMelatoninartificial lightcircadian timing systemmelanopsinmelatoninmetameric lightsensory processingsleep

Identifiers

PMID35998110
PMCPMC9644120
OpenAlexW4292801071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.