Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35998039›Full record

Trial reportJCI insight2022

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of nicotinamide riboside and pterostilbene supplementation in experimental muscle injury in elderly individuals.

Jonas Brorson Jensen, Ole L Dollerup, Andreas B Møller, Tine B Billeskov, Emilie Dalbram, Sabina Chubanava, Mads V Damgaard, Ryan W Dellinger, Kajetan Trošt, Thomas Moritz and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JCI insight, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03754842 (Effect of Nicotinamide Riboside and Pterostilbene Supplementation on Muscle Regeneration in Elderly Humans - A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03754842 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Nicotinamide Riboside and Pterostilbene Supplementation on Muscle Regeneration in Elderly Humans - A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2019 to 2020Enrolled32ConditionsMuscle InjuryArmsPlacebo (twice daily), Nicotinamide Riboside/Pterostilbene (500 mg/100 mg twice daily)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects of NADThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Aging and cancer: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pterostilbene-mediated microbiota shifts: Implications and opportunities.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Regulation of and challenges in targeting NADNature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Dietary Supplementation With NAD+-Boosting Compounds in Humans: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. NADJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonas Brorson JensenDepartment of Biomedicine and.
Ole L DollerupResearch Laboratory for Biochemical Pathology, Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas B MøllerResearch Laboratory for Biochemical Pathology, Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tine B BilleskovResearch Laboratory for Biochemical Pathology, Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Emilie DalbramNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research (CBMR), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sabina ChubanavaNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research (CBMR), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mads V DamgaardNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research (CBMR), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ryan W DellingerElysium Health, New York, New York, USA.
Kajetan TroštNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research (CBMR), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas MoritzNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research (CBMR), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Steffen RinggaardMagnetic Resonance Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, and.
Niels MøllerDiabetes and Hormonal Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jonas T TreebakNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research (CBMR), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jean FarupDepartment of Biomedicine and.
Niels JessenDepartment of Biomedicine and.
Novo Nordisk Foundation · DKSteno Diabetes Centers · DKAarhus University · DKResonance Research (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDDuring aging, there is a functional decline in the pool of muscle stem cells (MuSCs) that influences the functional and regenerative capacity of skeletal muscle. Preclinical evidence has suggested that nicotinamide riboside (NR) and pterostilbene (PT) can improve muscle regeneration, e.g., by increasing MuSC function. The objective of this study was to investigate if supplementation with NR and PT (NRPT) promotes skeletal muscle regeneration after muscle injury in elderly individuals by improved recruitment of MuSCs.METHODSThirty-two elderly individuals (55-80 years of age) were randomized to daily supplementation with either NRPT (1,000 mg NR and 200 mg PT) or matched placebo. Two weeks after initiation of supplementation, skeletal muscle injury was induced by electrically induced eccentric muscle work. Skeletal muscle biopsies were obtained before, 2 hours after, and 2, 8, and 30 days after injury.RESULTSA substantial skeletal muscle injury was induced by the protocol and associated with release of myoglobin and creatine kinase, muscle soreness, tissue edema, and a decrease in muscle strength. MuSC content, proliferation, and cell size revealed a large demand for recruitment after injury, but this was not affected by NRPT. Furthermore, histological analyses of muscle fiber area, central nuclei, and embryonic myosin heavy chain showed no NRPT supplementation effect.CONCLUSIONDaily supplementation with 1,000 mg NR and 200 mg PT is safe but does not improve recruitment of the MuSC pool or other measures of muscle recovery in response to injury or subsequent regeneration in elderly individuals.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03754842.FUNDINGNovo Nordisk Foundation (NNF17OC0027242) and Novo Nordisk Foundation CBMR.

Indexed as

Muscular DiseasesMyosin Heavy ChainsAgedCreatine Kinase, MM FormDietary SupplementsHumansMuscle, SkeletalMyoglobinNiacinamidePyridinium CompoundsStilbenesCreatine Kinase, MM FormMyoglobinMyosin Heavy ChainsNiacinamidenicotinamide-beta-ribosidepterostilbenePyridinium CompoundsStilbenesAgingHuman stem cellsMuscle BiologySkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID35998039
PMCPMC9675477
OpenAlexW4292774818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.