Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35998022›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Reliability and Validity of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the Smartphone App AllerSearch for Hay Fever: Prospective Observational Study.

Yasutsugu Akasaki, Takenori Inomata, Jaemyoung Sung, Yuichi Okumura, Kenta Fujio, Maria Miura, Kunihiko Hirosawa, Masao Iwagami, Masahiro Nakamura, Nobuyuki Ebihara and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yasutsugu AkasakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9527-0115
Takenori InomataDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3435-1055
Jaemyoung SungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9441-3687
Yuichi OkumuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5521-5469
Kenta FujioDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8472-0800
Maria MiuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2600-2085
Kunihiko HirosawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6775-3697
Masao IwagamiDepartment of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7079-0640
Masahiro NakamuraPrecision Health, Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4363-069X
Nobuyuki EbiharaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Urayasu Hospital, Juntendo University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6772-6549
Masahiro NakamuraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-4458
Takuma IdeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8204-5808
Ken NaginoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0317-6074
Akira MurakamiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-2514
Juntendo University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPJuntendo University Urayasu Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHay fever is a highly prevalent, heterogenous, and multifactorial disease. Patients may benefit from longitudinal assessments using mobile health (mHealth) principles. We have previously attempted to establish an effective mHealth platform for patients with hay fever through AllerSearch, our in-house smartphone app that assesses electronic patient-reported outcomes through a questionnaire on hay fever and provides evidence-based advice. To be used by the public, an investigation on its reliability and validity is necessary.

objectiveThe aim of this paper is to assess the reliability and validity of subjective symptom data on hay fever collected through our app, AllerSearch.

methodsThis study used a prospective observational design. The participants were patients aged ≥20 years recruited from a single university hospital between June 2, 2021, and January 26, 2022. We excluded patients who could not use smartphones as well as those with incomplete data records and outlier data. All participants answered the Japanese Allergic Conjunctival Disease Standard Quality of Life Questionnaire (JACQLQ), first in the paper-and-pencil format and subsequently on AllerSearch on the same day. The JACQLQ comprises the following three domains: Domain I, with 9 items on ocular or nasal symptoms; Domain II, with 17 items on daily activity and psychological well-being; and Domain III, with 3 items on overall condition by face score. The concordance rate of each domain between the 2 platforms was calculated. The internal consistency of Domains I and II of the 2 platforms was assessed using Cronbach alpha coefficients, the concurrent validity of Domains I and II was assessed by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients, and the mean differences between the 2 platforms were assessed using Bland-Altman analysis.

resultsIn total, 22 participants were recruited; the data of 20 (91%) participants were analyzed. The average age was 65.4 (SD 12.8) years, and 80% (16/20) of the participants were women. The concordance rate of Domains I, II, and III between the paper-based and app-based JACQLQ was 0.78, 0.85, and 0.90, respectively. The internal consistency of Domains I and II between the 2 platforms was satisfactory (Cronbach alpha of .964 and .919, respectively). Pearson correlation analysis yielded a significant positive correlation between Domains I and II across the 2 platforms (r=0.920 and r=0.968, respectively). The mean difference in Domains I and II between the 2 platforms was 3.35 units (95% limits of agreement: -6.51 to 13.2).

conclusionsOur findings indicate that AllerSearch is a valid and reliable tool for the collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes to assess hay fever, contributing to the advantages of the mHealth platform.

Indexed as

allergic conjunctivitisAllerSearchhay feverJACQLQJapanese Allergic Conjunctival Disease Standard Quality of Life QuestionnairemHealthmobile healthpatient-reported outcomequestionnairereliabilitysmartphone appvalidity

Identifiers

PMID35998022
PMCPMC9449823
OpenAlexW4292731256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.