Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997912›Full record

ArticleHEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues2022

Getting Beyond Pros and Cons: Results of a Stakeholder Needs Assessment on Physician Assisted Dying in the Hospital Setting.

Andrea Frolic, Leslie Murray, Marilyn Swinton, Paul Miller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Access Isn't Enough: Evaluating the Quality of a Hospital Medical Assistance in Dying Program.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. MAiD to Last: Creating a Care Ecology for Sustainable Medical Assistance in Dying Services.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea FrolicProgram for Ethics and Care Ecologies (PEaCE), Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University Medical Center, 1F9-1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada. iamfrolic@gmail.com.
Leslie MurrayMohawk College, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Marilyn SwintonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Paul MillerMedical Assistance in Dying Program, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
McMaster University · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CAMohawk College · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the attitudes and needs of physicians and health professional staff at a tertiary care hospital in Canada regarding the introduction of physician assisted dying (PAD) during 2015-16. This research aimed to develop an understanding of the wishes, concerns and hopes of stakeholders related to handling requests for PAD; to determine what supports/structures/resources health care professionals (HCP) require in order to ensure high quality and compassionate care for patients requesting PAD, and a supportive environment for all healthcare providers across the moral spectrum. This study constituted a mixed methods design with a qualitative descriptive approach for the study's qualitative component. A total of 303 HCPs working in a tertiary care hospital completed an online survey and 64 HCPs working in hospital units with high mortality rates participated in 8 focus group discussions. Both focus group and survey data coalesced around several themes to support the implementation of PAD following the decriminalization of this practice: the importance of high quality care; honoring moral diversity; supporting values (such as autonomy, privacy, beneficence); and developing resources, including collaboration with palliative care, education, policies and a specialized team. This study provided the foundational evidence to support the development of the PAD program described in other papers in this collection, and can be a model for gathering evidence from stakeholders to inform the implementation of PAD in any healthcare organization.

Indexed as

PhysiciansSuicide, AssistedCanadaHospitalsHumansNeeds AssessmentPalliative CareConsultationEuthanasiaHospitalsMAiDMedical Assistance in DyingMixed methodsNeeds assessmentOrganizational ethicsPhysician Assisted DyingStakeholders

Identifiers

PMID35997912
PMCPMC9671973
OpenAlexW4292738045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.