Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997856›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2022

New approach to assessing and addressing moral distress in intensive care unit personnel: a case study.

Peter M Dodek, Kim Jameson, Jacques M Chevalier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter M DodekCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences (CHÉOS) and Division of Critical Care Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital and The University of British Columbia, 588-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada. peter.dodek@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3314-4655
Kim JamesonVancouver Coastal Health Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jacques M ChevalierCarleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Carleton University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAVancouver Coastal Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo test a new approach to address moral distress in intensive care unit (ICU) personnel.

methodsUsing principles of participatory action research, we developed an eight-step moral conflict assessment (MCA) that guides participants in describing the behaviour that they have to implement, the effects this has on them, their current coping strategies, their values in conflict, any other concerns related to the situation, what helps and hinders the situation, new coping strategies, and the effect of the preceding steps on participants. This assessment was tested with eight ICU providers in an 11-bed community ICU.

resultsDuring three one-hour sessions, participants described their moral distress that was caused by the use of ongoing life-support for a patient who the team believed did not prefer this course of care, but whose family was requesting it. Participants experienced frustration and discouragement and coping strategies included speaking to colleagues and exercising. They felt that they were unable to take meaningful action to resolve this conflict. Values that were in conflict in the situation included beneficence and patient autonomy. Based on ranking of helping and hindering factors, the team proposed new strategies including improving consistency of care plans and educating patients' family members and ICU personnel about advance care planning and end-of-life care. After completing this assessment, participants reported less stress and a greater ability to take meaningful action, including some of the proposed new strategies.

conclusionsWe found this new approach to address moral distress in ICU personnel to be feasible and a useful tool for facilitating plans for reducing moral distress.

Indexed as

Stress, PsychologicalTerminal CareAdaptation, PsychologicalAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansIntensive Care UnitsMoralsSurveys and Questionnairesaction researchgoals of careintensive caremoral distress

Identifiers

PMID35997856
PMCPMC9499887
OpenAlexW4292774346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.