Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997829›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2022

Interpretable machine learning model to predict rupture of small intracranial aneurysms and facilitate clinical decision.

WeiGen Xiong, TingTing Chen, Jun Li, Lan Xiang, Cheng Zhang, Liang Xiang, YingBin Li, Dong Chu, YueZhang Wu, Qiong Jie and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

WeiGen Xiong *School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
TingTing Chen *School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Jun Li *Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Lan XiangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital (People's Hospital of Hunan Province), Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Cheng ZhangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital (People's Hospital of Hunan Province), Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Liang XiangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital (People's Hospital of Hunan Province), Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
YingBin LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Dong ChuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
YueZhang WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qiong JieDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
RunZe QiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
ZeYue XuDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
JianJun ZouDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. zoujianjun100@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0886-3153
HongWei FanDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. fanhongwei178@sina.com.
ZhiHong ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital (People's Hospital of Hunan Province), Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China. zhaozhihong51818@hotmail.com.
China Pharmaceutical University · CNHunan Normal University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

Nanjing Pharmaceutical Association - Changzhou Siyao - Hospital Pharmaceutical Research Fund 2021YX014National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173899the Special Scientific Research Fund Project of Jiangsu Research Hospital Association - Precisely Drug use - CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. JY202001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating whether to treat the rupture risk of small intracranial aneurysms (IAs) with size ≤ 7 mm in diameter is difficult but crucial. We aimed to construct and externally validate a convenient machine learning (ML) model for assessing the rupture risk of small IAs. One thousand four patients with small IAs recruited from two hospitals were included in our retrospective research. The patients at hospital 1 were stratified into training (70%) and internal validation set (30%) randomly, and the patients at hospital 2 were used for external validation. We selected predictive features using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method and constructed five ML models applying diverse algorithms including random forest classifier (RFC), categorical boosting (CatBoost), support vector machine (SVM) with linear kernel, light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis provided interpretation for the best ML model. The training, internal, and external validation cohorts included 658, 282, and 64 IAs, respectively. The best performance was presented by SVM as AUC of 0.817 in the internal [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.769-0.866] and 0.893 in the external (95% CI, 0.808-0.979) validation cohorts, which overperformed compared with the PHASES score significantly (all P < 0.001). SHAP analysis showed maximum size, location, and irregular shape were the top three important features to predict rupture. Our SVM model based on readily accessible features presented satisfying ability of discrimination in predicting the rupture IAs with small size. Morphological parameters made important contributions to prediction result.

Indexed as

Intracranial AneurysmAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesSupport Vector MachineIntracranial aneurysmMachine learningRisk assessmentRupture

Identifiers

PMID35997829
OpenAlexW4292833494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.