Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997691›Full record

Trial reportNursing research

Treatment Fidelity in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Heart Failure.

Meghan O'Connell, Joanne DeSanto Iennaco, Sarah Linsky, Sangchoon Jeon, Samantha Conley, Edward Gaiser, Nancy S Redeker

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 6 countries.

University of Connecticut · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Rest Activity Rhythms and Cognitive Function in Stable Heart FailureR01NR016191 · NINR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI REDEKER, NANCY S · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Yale Center for Sleep Disturbance in Acute and Chronic ConditionsP20NR014126 · NINR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI REDEKER, NANCY S, YAGGI, HENRY KLAR · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NURSE HOME VISITATION FOR MOTHERS AND CHILDRENR01NR001691 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI OLDS, DAVID L · 1988 to 1992
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NINR NIH HHS P20 NR014126NINR NIH HHS R01 NR001691NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is an efficacious treatment for people with chronic insomnia, including those with heart failure (HF). Treatment fidelity evaluation is needed to ensure study validity and reliability.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to apply the National Institutes of Health Behavioral Change Consortium framework to ensure adequate treatment fidelity in a randomized controlled trial of CBT-I for people with stable HF.

methodsWe describe strategies to ensure treatment fidelity in study design, provider training, and treatment delivery. We measured treatment receipt (observation and self-report) and enactment of CBT-I strategies (self-report and actigraphy). We used the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes About Sleep Scale and the Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire to indicate sleep-related beliefs and cognitions. We computed descriptive statistics for demographic characteristics, treatment receipt, and enactment variables. We compared baseline and post-intervention dichotomous sleep behaviors using the two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We calculated the root mean square of successive difference in time of sleep onset and midpoint (actigraphy) to indicate day-by-day variability in bed and wake times.

resultsMost participants completed the CBT-I intervention and follow-up assessments and attended each group or make-up session. Most correctly computed their sleep efficiency and completed their homework. Most participants used the sleep tracker and reported using strategies to improve their sleep schedules. There was a significant decrease in actigraph-measured light intensity during the 30 minutes and 1 hour before bedtime between baseline and post-intervention and no statistically significant changes in light intensity after waking or in nap frequency. Most of those who woke during the night got out of bed, consistent with recommendations. There were significant improvements on all of the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes About Sleep items and total score and all but one item on the Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire. DISCUSSION: Preserved treatment fidelity may explain the large and sustained effects in people with HF found in our trial. Further research is needed to evaluate CBT-I's effectiveness and implementation strategies among people with HF in real-world clinical settings.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyHeart FailureSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersHumansReproducibility of ResultsSleepTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35997691
PMCPMC9617756
OpenAlexW4292749626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.