Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997518›Full record

ArticleSICOT-J2022

Evaluation of patella height in native knees and arthroplasty: an instructional review.

Christian Konrads, Anna J Schreiner, Simone Cober, Daniel Schüll, Sufian S Ahmad, Mohammad A Alshrouf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SICOT-J, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Save the Patella.SICOT-J · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian KonradsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1285-4615
Anna J SchreinerOrthopaedic Clinic Markgröningen, 71706 Markgröningen, Germany.
Simone CoberDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Daniel SchüllDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Sufian S AhmadDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Mohammad A AlshroufThe School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, 11942 Amman, Jordan.
University of Tübingen · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the gold standard for treating advanced knee osteoarthritis. Among the postoperative complications of TKA are true patella infera (TPI) and pseudo patella infera (PPI), which should be differentiated since TPI exhibits significantly worse clinical outcomes. Multiple radiological patella height indices (PHI) exist; some were modified or originally designed for knees with implanted endoprostheses. However, there is no consensus on measuring and comparing patella height. Due to the lack of established, simple, reliable, and reproducible concepts for assessing patella height for arthroplasty, measuring patella height and the change of patella height by or after TKA have been challenging tasks for clinicians and researchers. This is a review of the current literature on methods for measuring patella height, with special attention to the ability to differentiate between the TPI and PPI after TKA. All literature on the topic was retrieved, and references from relevant articles were investigated until the end of April 2022.

Indexed as

Caton-DeschampsInsall-SalvatiPatella heightPatella inferaReliabilityTKA

Identifiers

PMID35997518
PMCPMC9397114
OpenAlexW4292714269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.