Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997477›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2022

Prospective assessment of VI-RADS score in multiparametric MRI in bladder cancer: accuracy and the factors affecting the results.

Ural Oğuz, Tümay Bekçi, Ercan Öğreden, Serdar Aslan, Aslıhan Duman, Erhan Demirelli, Demet Şengül, Doğan Sabri Tok, Osman Çağatay Çiftçi, Alptekin Tosun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. MRI evaluation of vesical imaging reporting and data system for bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ural OğuzDepartment of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Turkey.
Tümay BekçiDepartment of Radiology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Turkey.
Ercan ÖğredenDepartment of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Turkey.
Serdar AslanDepartment of Radiology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Turkey.
Aslıhan DumanDepartment of Pathology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Turkey.
Erhan DemirelliDepartment of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Turkey.
Demet ŞengülDepartment of Pathology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Turkey.
Doğan Sabri TokDepartment of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Turkey.
Osman Çağatay ÇiftçiDepartment of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Turkey.
Alptekin TosunDepartment of Radiology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Turkey.
Giresun University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the accuracy of Vesical Imaging - Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in the detection of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and to determine which factors affect the results of this scoring system. METHODS A prospective data analysis of 80 patients who were detected to have bladder tumor was performed between March 2019 and October 2020. VI-RADS scoring was used to determine the probability of muscle invasion. The scores were compared with pathological results to evaluate the accuracy of the VI-RADS scoring system. Interobserver agreement was assessed by VI-RADS scoring of 20 randomly chosen patients by a different experienced radiologist. RESULTS Using the VI-RADS scoring system, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) were 87.5%, 87.5%, 63.6%, and 96.6%, respectively. The interobserver agreement expressed as the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.44-0.84, P < .001). In addition, the flat appearance of the tumor was an important factor affecting the accuracy of the VI-RADS score (odds ratio: 5.3 [95% CI: 1.1-27.0] and relative risk: 1.87 [95% CI: 1.24-2.82]). CONCLUSION The mpMRI, used in conjunction with VI-RADS, has proven to be an effective imaging method for detecting muscle invasion in cases of bladder cancer. VI-RADS scoring system can distinguish whether there is a muscle-invasive and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with acceptable accuracy. In addition, the flat appearance of the tumor is an important entity that can affect the accuracy of the VI-RADS scoring system.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsData SystemsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPredictive Value of TestsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35997477
PMCPMC9682553
OpenAlexW4292731276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.