Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997459›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2022

A Narrative Review on the Effectiveness of Bone Regeneration Procedures with OsteoBiol

Tea Romasco, Margherita Tumedei, Francesco Inchingolo, Pamela Pignatelli, Lorenzo Montesani, Giovanna Iezzi, Morena Petrini, Adriano Piattelli, Natalia Di Pietro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Pro-Angiogenic Response to OsteoBiolBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tea RomascoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66013 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-3838
Margherita TumedeiDepartment of Medical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Francesco InchingoloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3797-5883
Pamela PignatelliDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00131 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3023-7143
Lorenzo MontesaniPrivate Practice, 00187 Rome, Italy.
Giovanna IezziDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66013 Chieti, Italy.
Morena PetriniDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66013 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3849-4304
Adriano PiattelliSchool of Dentistry, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, Via di Sant'Alessandro 8, 00131 Rome, Italy.
Natalia Di PietroDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66013 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9720-2116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the years, several bone regeneration procedures have been proposed using natural (autografts, allografts, and xenografts) and synthetic (i.e., metals, ceramics, and polymers) bone grafts. In particular, numerous

Indexed as

biomaterialsbone defectsbone regenerationmaxillary defectsoral surgeryporcine bone graftsxenografts

Identifiers

PMID35997459
PMCPMC9397035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.