Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997442›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2022

Geometry-Based Computational Fluid Dynamic Model for Predicting the Biological Behavior of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Abdalla M Omar, Mohamed H Hassan, Evangelos Daskalakis, Gokhan Ates, Charlie J Bright, Zhanyan Xu, Emily J Powell, Wajira Mirihanage, Paulo J D S Bartolo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Computational approaches in bioprinting processes.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdalla M OmarDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Mohamed H HassanDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0832-8559
Evangelos DaskalakisDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3855-5442
Gokhan AtesDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7020-8171
Charlie J BrightDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1975-9477
Zhanyan XuDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Emily J PowellDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Wajira MirihanageDepartment of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Paulo J D S BartoloDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3683-726X
University of Manchester · GBNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of the UK, the Global Challenges Research Fund (CRF) EP/R01513/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of biocompatible and biodegradable porous scaffolds produced via additive manufacturing is one of the most common approaches in tissue engineering. The geometric design of tissue engineering scaffolds (e.g., pore size, pore shape, and pore distribution) has a significant impact on their biological behavior. Fluid flow dynamics are important for understanding blood flow through a porous structure, as they determine the transport of nutrients and oxygen to cells and the flushing of toxic waste. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the scaffold architecture, pore size and distribution on its biological performance using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Different blood flow velocities (BFV) induce wall shear stresses (WSS) on cells. WSS values above 30 mPa are detrimental to their growth. In this study, two scaffold designs were considered: rectangular scaffolds with uniform square pores (300, 350, and 450 µm), and anatomically designed circular scaffolds with a bone-like structure and pore size gradient (476-979 µm). The anatomically designed scaffolds provided the best fluid flow conditions, suggesting a 24.21% improvement in the biological performance compared to the rectangular scaffolds. The numerical observations are aligned with those of previously reported biological studies.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingbone scaffoldscell viabilitycomputational fluid dynamicsscaffold geometry

Identifiers

PMID35997442
PMCPMC9397055
OpenAlexW4288077704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.