Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997432›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Design Strategies and Biomimetic Approaches for Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Regeneration.

Federico Pupilli, Andrea Ruffini, Massimiliano Dapporto, Marta Tavoni, Anna Tampieri, Simone Sprio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Injectable bioactive scaffold able to stimulate oral bone regeneration on demand.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Federico PupilliInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council of Italy, 48018 Faenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4824-3979
Andrea RuffiniInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council of Italy, 48018 Faenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7170-9821
Massimiliano DapportoInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council of Italy, 48018 Faenza, Italy.
Marta TavoniInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council of Italy, 48018 Faenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1036-7610
Anna TampieriInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council of Italy, 48018 Faenza, Italy.
Simone SprioInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council of Italy, 48018 Faenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1526-7915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone is a complex biologic tissue, which is extremely relevant for various physiological functions, in addition to movement, organ protection, and weight bearing. The repair of critical size bone defects is a still unmet clinical need, and over the past decades, material scientists have been expending efforts to find effective technological solutions, based on the use of scaffolds. In this context, biomimetics which is intended as the ability of a scaffold to reproduce compositional and structural features of the host tissues, is increasingly considered as a guide for this purpose. However, the achievement of implants that mimic the very complex bone composition, multi-scale structure, and mechanics is still an open challenge. Indeed, despite the fact that calcium phosphates are widely recognized as elective biomaterials to fabricate regenerative bone scaffolds, their processing into 3D devices with suitable cell-instructing features is still prevented by insurmountable drawbacks. With respect to biomaterials science, new approaches maybe conceived to gain ground and promise for a substantial leap forward in this field. The present review provides an overview of physicochemical and structural features of bone tissue that are responsible for its biologic behavior. Moreover, relevant and recent technological approaches, also inspired by natural processes and structures, are described, which can be considered as a leverage for future development of next generation bioactive medical devices.

Indexed as

3D scaffoldsbiomimeticsbiomineralizationbiomorphic transformationsbone regenerationhydroxyapatiteion doping

Identifiers

PMID35997432
PMCPMC9397031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.