Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997415›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2022

Online Assessment and Game-Based Development of Inductive Reasoning.

Attila Pásztor, Andrea Magyar, Anita Pásztor-Kovács, Attila Rausch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Attila PásztorInstitute of Education, University of Szeged, 6722 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8441-446X
Andrea MagyarMTA-SZTE Digital Learning Technologies Research Group, 6722 Szeged, Hungary.
Anita Pásztor-KovácsInstitute of Education, University of Szeged, 6722 Szeged, Hungary.
Attila RauschInstitute of Education, Eötvös Loránd University, 1075 Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

At the time of writing this paper, Attila Rausch was the holder of the János Bolyai Research Fel-lowship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. N/AScientific Foundations of Education Research Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences KOZOKT2021-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of the study were (1) to develop a domain-general computer-based assessment tool for inductive reasoning and to empirically test the theoretical models of Klauer and Christou and Papageorgiou; and (2) to develop an online game to foster inductive reasoning through mathematical content and to investigate its effectiveness. The sample was drawn from fifth-grade students for the assessment (N = 267) along with the intervention study (N = 122). The online figurative test consisted of 54 items: nine items were developed for each of the six inductive reasoning processes. The digital game-based training program included 120 learning tasks embedded in mathematical content with differential feedback and instructional support. The test had good psychometric properties regarding reliabilities, means, and standard deviations. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the six processes of inductive reasoning and the three latent factors of Similarity, Dissimilarity, and Integration could be empirically confirmed. The training program was effective in general (corrected effect size = .38); however, the process of cross-classification was not developed significantly. Findings could contribute to a more detailed understanding of the structure and the modifiability of inductive reasoning processes and could reveal further insights into the nature of fluid intelligence.

Indexed as

assessmentgame-based learninginductive reasoningKarl Josef Klauer’s model

Identifiers

PMID35997415
PMCPMC9397073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.