Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997310›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2022

Effects of chemical warfare agent decontaminants on trace survival: Impact on fingermarks deposited on glass.

Isabelle Radgen-Morvant, Natalie Kummer, Christophe Curty, Olivier Delémont

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interpol review of fingermark composition and visualization 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isabelle Radgen-MorvantÉcole des sciences criminelles, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Natalie KummerÉcole des sciences criminelles, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christophe CurtyFederal Office for Civil Protection (FOCP), Laboratoire Spiez, Spiez, Switzerland.
Olivier DelémontÉcole des sciences criminelles, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHSpiez Laboratory · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a chemical incident involving chemical warfare agents or more broadly, chemical weapons, there are two possible approaches in dealing with the traditional forensic analysis of contaminated exhibits. The first is to analyze the contaminated items under safe conditions (i.e. in laboratories dedicated to the handling of such substances), while the second relies on item decontamination prior to processing them in traditional forensic laboratories. One of the main limitations of the latter is the possible degradation or destruction of traces caused by the decontamination process. Hence, it is crucial to have as much information as possible on the impact of different decontamination agents and procedures on traces. This research presents experimental results on the recovery of fingermarks on glass after the application of decontaminants typically used in case of chemical incidents. The impact of 11 decontaminants on fingermarks deposited on glass and on the subsequent enhancement with cyanoacrylate and Small Particle Reagent (SPR) was evaluated (by visual examination) by four evaluators. The results of the study demonstrated that the persistence of fingermarks on glass is highly dependent on the type of decontaminant used. Decontamination agents based on the principle of nucleophilic substitution to neutralize toxic chemicals allowed good subsequent development of fingermarks with SPR. Powdered decontaminants did not show any indication of alteration of fingermarks, whereas decontamination with oxidants leads to variable results.

Indexed as

Chemical Warfare AgentsCyanoacrylatesDecontaminationDermatoglyphicsForensic MedicineGlassIndicators and ReagentsChemical Warfare AgentsCyanoacrylatesIndicators and ReagentsCBRNchemical weaponscyanoacrylatedecontaminantsfingermarksnon-porous surfacessmall particle reagent

Identifiers

PMID35997310
PMCPMC9804262
OpenAlexW4292731050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.