Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35997279›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology2022

Intravital imaging of mucus transport in asthmatic mice using microscopic optical coherence tomography.

Mario Pieper, Hinnerk Schulz-Hildebrandt, Inken Schmudde, Katharina M Quell, Yves Laumonnier, Gereon Hüttmann, Peter König

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mario PieperInstitute of Anatomy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2589-6782
Hinnerk Schulz-HildebrandtAirway Research Center North (ARCN), University of Lübeck, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Lübeck, Germany.
Inken SchmuddeInstitute of Anatomy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Katharina M QuellAirway Research Center North (ARCN), University of Lübeck, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Lübeck, Germany.
Yves LaumonnierAirway Research Center North (ARCN), University of Lübeck, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Lübeck, Germany.
Gereon HüttmannAirway Research Center North (ARCN), University of Lübeck, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Lübeck, Germany.
Peter KönigInstitute of Anatomy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
German Center for Lung Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases. Mucus overproduction is consistently linked to asthma morbidity and mortality. Despite the knowledge of the importance of mucus, little data exist on how mucus is transported in asthma and the immediate effects of therapeutic intervention. We therefore used microscopic optical coherence tomography (mOCT) to study spontaneous and induced mucus transport in an interleukin-13 (IL-13)-induced asthma mouse model and examined the effects of isotonic (0.9% NaCl) and hypertonic saline (7% NaCl), which are used to induce mucus transport in cystic fibrosis. Without intervention, no bulk mucus transport was observed by mOCT and no intraluminal mucus was detectable in the intrapulmonary airways by histology. Administration of ATP-γ-S induced mucus secretion into the airway lumen, but it did not result in bulk mucus transport in the trachea. Intraluminal-secreted immobile mucus could be mobilized by administration of isotonic or hypertonic saline but hypertonic saline mobilized mucus more reliably than isotonic saline. Irrespective of saline concentration, the mucus was transported in mucus chunks. In contrast to isotonic saline solution, hypertonic saline solution alone was able to induce mucus secretion. In conclusion, mOCT is suitable to examine the effects of mucus-mobilizing therapies in vivo. Although hypertonic saline was more efficient in inducing mucus transport, it induced mucus secretion, which might explain its limited benefit in patients with asthma.

Indexed as

AsthmaInterleukin-13Adenosine TriphosphateAnimalsIntravital MicroscopyMiceMucusSaline SolutionSaline Solution, HypertonicSodium ChlorideTomography, Optical CoherenceAdenosine TriphosphateInterleukin-13Saline SolutionSaline Solution, HypertonicSodium Chlorideasthmatic micehypertonic salinemucus transportOCTtrachea

Identifiers

PMID35997279
PMCPMC9529266
OpenAlexW4292730694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.