ArticleGM crops & food2022
Public perception of plant gene technologies worldwide in the light of food security.
Article in GM crops & food, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- scientific, social, ecological rationality and public attitudes toward genetically modified food in China: based on the survey of urban residents in three cities of China.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- Trust and doubt coexist: an empirical study on the acceptance mechanism of transgenic technology among Chinese youth.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- AI-Guided DNA-Free and Genotype-Independent Genome Editing for Soybean Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Insights and applications for understanding the allergology, immunology and biotechnology of plant systems.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Transforming viticulture through genomic innovation and integrated pest management for sustainable grape production.NPJ science of plants · 2026Review
- Review
- Importance-Performance Map Analysis of the Drivers for the Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food with a Theory of Planned Behavior Groundwork.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recent developments, challenges and opportunities in genome editing for crop science from a societal perspective.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Enhancing quality and climate resilient traits in vegetatively propagated polyploids: transgenic and genome editing advancements, challenges and future directions.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- The decision to purchase genome edited food products by Iranian consumers: theory of planned behavior as a social intervention tool.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Article
- DNA-free CRISPR genome editing in raspberry (Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Article
- Rethinking progress: harmonizing the discourse on genetically modified crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Natural vs. genetically engineered microbiomes: understanding public attitudes for indoor applications and pathways for future engagement.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Can quinoa (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- How risk communication affects public trust in government: the moderating role of policy expectations.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The Adoption of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: the Public's Current Perception, the Regulatory Obstacles, and Ethical Challenges.GM crops & food · 2024Review
- The recent genetic modification techniques for improve soil conservation, nutrient uptake and utilization.GM crops & food · 2024Review
- Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Gene editing achieves consistently higher favorability in social and traditional media than GMOs.GM crops & food · 2023Article
- Consumer Attitude towards Genetically Modified Foods in Iran: Application of Three-Dimensional Model of Corporate Social Responsibility.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving global food security is becoming increasingly challenging and many stakeholders around the world are searching for new ways to reach this demanding goal. Here we demonstrate examples of genetically modified and genome edited plants introduced to the market in different world regions. Transgenic crops are regulated based on the characteristics of the product in many countries including the United States and Canada, while the European Union, India, China and others regulate process-based i.e. on how the product was made. We also present the public perception of state-of-the-art plant gene technologies in different regions of the world in the past 20 years. The results of literature analysis show that the public in Europe and North America is more familiar with the notion of genome editing and genetically modified organisms than the public in other world regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.