Observational studyActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022
Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar defects: Preoperative hysteroscopic evaluation.
Observational study in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of multimodal vaginal ultrasound in the detection and assessment of scar healing after caesarean section: a correlational meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of four imaging modalities for cesarean scar defect: a retrospective study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Clinical analysis of uterine parameters evaluated by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients treated by hysteroscopic approach with previous cesarean scar defect-related abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar defects: Preoperative hysteroscopic evaluation.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Observational
- Value and influencing factors of preoperative MRI evaluation for previous cesarean scar defect associated abnormal uterine bleeding in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciencesArticle
- Treatment of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy with Hysteroscopic Resection.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Prevalence, definition, and etiology of cesarean scar defect and treatment of cesarean scar disorder: A narrative review.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCesarean section scar defects (CSDs) are one of the long-term complications following cesarean section. They can be detected by transvaginal sonography, hysterosalpingography, sonohysterography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Hysteroscopy is frequently used in evaluating endometrial disease. However, the description of CSDs by hysteroscopy is very limited. Only a few papers about hysteroscopy evaluation have been published. This is an exploratory study to compare hysteroscopic findings with myometrial thickness and post-surgical outcomes. MATERIAL AND
methodsFrom February 2019 to December 2020, 143 women with CSDs were enrolled in the observational study. All women suffered from abnormal uterine bleeding and were evaluated in a standardized way with hysteroscopy before vaginal surgery. Dome-shaped CSDs could be clearly observed in all patients under hysteroscopy. We recorded the pictures of each patient under hysteroscopy and classified them. All patients underwent outpatient review at 3 and 6 months after surgery to obtain menstrual information and CSD scar size by MRI or transvaginal sonography.
resultsPale mucosae in the defect were meager endometrial lining covering the surface of muscle layer, cyst lesions were some cyst lesions in the defect, increased local vascularization was a vascular tree with branching and irregular vascular distribution in defect, polypoid lesions were polypoid lesions in the defect, and serrated niches were two niches at the anterior uterine isthmus. The features of the CSDs observed under hysteroscopy were identified as five phenotypes: pale mucosae (90/143, 62.9%), cyst lesions (23/143, 16.1%), polypoid lesions (19/143, 13.3%), increased local vascularization (27/143, 18.9%) and serrated niches (7/143, 4.9%). The most common finding in scar defects under hysteroscopy was pale mucosae in the CSD. The results suggest that patients with increased local vascularization and serrated niches have a high risk of thinner residual myometrium before vaginal repair (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in menstrual duration or in the outcome of vaginal repair for CSDs between these five phenotypes (p > 0.05).
conclusionsPatients with the abnormal blood vessel or serration phenotypes of defects under hysteroscopy may have a thinner residual myometrium. The phenotypes of hysteroscopic findings of CSDs have no correlation with the outcome of repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.