Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35996761›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2022

Improved survival in real-world patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score-matched cohort study comparing a period before the introduction of pembrolizumab (2003-2011) and a more recent period (2016-2020).

Satoru Taguchi, Taketo Kawai, Tohru Nakagawa, Jimpei Miyakawa, Kenjiro Kishitani, Kazuma Sugimoto, Yu Nakamura, Jun Kamei, Daisuke Obinata, Kenya Yamaguchi and 22 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Changes in Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes Across Therapeutic Eras in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Satoru TaguchiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1291-4294
Taketo KawaiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7279-2874
Tohru NakagawaDepartment of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jimpei MiyakawaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenjiro KishitaniDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuma SugimotoDepartment of Urology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yu NakamuraDepartment of Urology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun KameiDepartment of Urology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Daisuke ObinataDepartment of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenya YamaguchiDepartment of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8632-4169
Tomoyuki KanekoDepartment of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5762-7563
Kanae YoshidaDivision of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Sachi YamamotoDivision of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigenori KakutaniDivision of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichiro KanazawaDepartment of Urology, The Fraternity Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuriko SugiharaDepartment of Urology, The Fraternity Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mayuko TokunagaDepartment of Urology, The Fraternity Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiko MatsumotoDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukari UemuraBiostatistics Section, Department of Data Science, Center of Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyuki AkiyamaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta YamadaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke SatoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke YamadaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka EnomotoDivision of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki NishimatsuDepartment of Urology, The Fraternity Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira IshikawaDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinori TanakaDepartment of Urology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi NagaseDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya FujimuraDepartment of Urology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3421-8273
Hiroshi FukuharaDepartment of Urology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru TakahashiDepartment of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0819-9478
Haruki KumeDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPKyorin University · JPMitsui Memorial Hospital · JPNihon University · JPJichi Medical University · JPMusashino Red Cross Hospital · JPTeikyo University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPTokyo Teishin Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough the treatment strategy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has drastically changed since pembrolizumab was introduced in 2017, studies revealing current survival rates in aUC are lacking. This study aimed to assess (1) the improvement in survival among real-world patients with aUC after the introduction of pembrolizumab and (2) the direct survival-prolonging effect of pembrolizumab.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 531 patients with aUC undergoing salvage chemotherapy, including 200 patients treated in the pre-pembrolizumab era (2003-2011; earlier era) and 331 patients treated in a recent 5-year period (2016-2020; recent era). Using propensity score matching (PSM), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the earlier and recent eras, in addition to between the recent era, both with and without pembrolizumab use, and the earlier era.

resultsAfter PSM, the recent era cohort had significantly longer CSS (21 months) and OS (19 months) than the earlier era cohort (CSS and OS: 12 months). In secondary analyses using PSM, patients treated with pembrolizumab had significantly longer CSS (25 months) and OS (24 months) than those in the earlier era cohort (CSS and OS: 11 months), whereas patients who did not receive pembrolizumab in the recent era had similar outcomes (CSS and OS: 14 months) as the earlier era cohort (CSS and OS: 12 months).

conclusionsPatients with aUC treated in the recent era exhibited significantly longer survival than those treated before the introduction of pembrolizumab. The improved survival was primarily attributable to the use of pembrolizumab.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCohort StudiesHumansPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedpembrolizumabadvancedbladder cancermetastaticpembrolizumabpropensity score matchingurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35996761
PMCPMC10087413
OpenAlexW4293254734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.