Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35996420›Full record

ArticleJournal of academic librarianship2022

Knowledge management in the classroom using Mendeley technology.

Mari Aurora Favero Reis, Jacir Favretto, Neide Maria Favretto, Liani Maria Hanauer Favretto, Renato P Dos Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of academic librarianship, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Comparison of reference management software with new artificial intelligence-based tools.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mari Aurora Favero ReisUniversidade do Contestado, Concórdia, SC 89711-330, Brazil.
Jacir FavrettoUniversidade do Contestado, Concórdia, SC 89711-330, Brazil.
Neide Maria FavrettoUniversidade do Contestado, Concórdia, SC 89711-330, Brazil.
Liani Maria Hanauer FavrettoUniversidade do Contestado, Concórdia, SC 89711-330, Brazil.
Renato P Dos SantosUniversidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, RS 92425-350, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in higher education institutions is present in all courses, and academic instruction in research methodology is vital, with educational technologies being an essential component of this process. With the Covid-19 pandemic, there were changes in teaching, learning, and in performing scientific research in undergraduate courses. Among the technologies, the Mendeley reference management tool has become increasingly helpful in these contexts. Therefore, this manuscript is an account of workshop experiences for the use of the Mendeley tool in the teaching of Research Methodology and Scientific Methodology offered in the distance education modality in undergraduate courses at the Universidade do Contestado, Brazil. After basic instruction on Mendeley, students participating in the workshops were guided to apply the tool using Bardin's content analysis technique. This technique is usually laborious and seldom involved in literature reviews by undergraduate students; Mendeley technology makes it more accessible. From experiences with the 2020 and 2021 workshops, during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is suggested that the content analysis method combined with the Mendeley technology can help students present better literature reviews, especially for final graduation projects such as course completion monographs.

Indexed as

Academic researchContent analysisCOVID-19 pandemicDistance learningMendeleyTechnology in education

Identifiers

PMID35996420
PMCPMC9385396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.