Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35996314›Full record

ReviewPsychological reports2024

Structural Relationships Among Mental Boundaries, Childhood Imaginary Companions, Creative Experiences, and Entity Encounters.

Kenneth Drinkwater, Neil Dagnall, James Houran, Andrew Denovan, Ciarán O'Keeffe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenneth DrinkwaterManchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4015-0578
Neil DagnallManchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
James HouranLaboratory for Statistics and Computation, ISLA-Instituto Politécnico de Gestão e Tecnologia; and Integrated Knowledge Systems, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA.
Andrew DenovanUniversity of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9082-7225
Ciarán O'KeeffeBuckinghamshire New University, High Wycombe, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9655-3261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated relationships between thin mental boundary functioning, creativity, imaginary companions (ICs), and anomalous '(entity) encounter experiences.' A convenience sample of 389 respondents completed the Revised Transliminality Scale, Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences, Creative Experiences Questionnaire, Survey of Strange Events, and a measure of Childhood Imaginary Companions. Competing testing with path analysis found that the best-fitting model was consistent with the causal chain of 'Thin Boundaries (transliminality and schizotypy) → Creative Experiences → ICs → (Entity) Encounter Experiences.' These results suggest that deep-types of ICs (i.e., showing apparent independent agency) are perhaps most accurately characterized as syncretic cognitions versus hallucination-like experiences. The authors examine these findings relative to study limitations, as well as discussing the need for future research that approaches ICs as a special mental state that can facilitate allied altered-anomalous experiences. In this context, this study furthered understanding of relationships between conscious states related to mental boundaries, childhood imaginary companions, creative experiences, and entity encounters.

Indexed as

CreativityImaginationAdolescentAdultFemaleHallucinationsHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultboundary functioningcreativityEncounter experiencesimaginary companionstransliminality

Identifiers

PMID35996314
PMCPMC11529105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.