SynthesisBrain and behavior2022
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and retinal changes in optical coherence tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring amyotrophic lateral sclerosis through the visual system: A systematic review.European journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Deep Learning and Machine Learning Algorithms for Retinal Image Analysis in Neurodegenerative Disease: Systematic Review of Datasets and Models.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Pooled it
- Changes in the retina and choroid in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and retinal changes in optical coherence tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Brain and behavior · 2022Pooled it
- Evolution of Retinal Morphology Changes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of retinal markers and incident amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: An optical coherence tomography-based cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Changes in the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Parkinson's Disease.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Article
- Differential Study of Retinal Thicknesses in the Eyes of Alzheimer's Patients, Multiple Sclerosis Patients and Healthy Subjects.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Retinal fingerprints of ALS in patients: Ganglion cell apoptosis and TDP-43/p62 misplacement.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIncreasing evidence suggests Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) as a widespread pathological process comprising nonmotor features like fatigue, mild sensory symptoms, cognitive decline, and visual impairment. Measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) may correlate with the neurodegeneration associated with ALS. In addition to RNFL thickness, other OCT parameters have been explored in the context of diagnosing ALS and predicting disease severity. In this study, we explore the possibility that OCT parameters of patients with ALS may differ significantly from those of healthy controls and thus serve as biomarkers for the disease and its progression. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween 2010 and 2021, the PubMed and EMBASE databases were examined for English language literature. ALS severity was assessed using the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R). The pooled mean differences in RNFL thickness between ALS patients and controls were calculated using the Standard Mean Difference (Hedges's g) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) in STATA software version 16.
resultsEleven studies were reviewed for data collection. RNFL thickness was not statistically significantly different between ALS patients (n = 412) and controls (n = 376) (Hedges's g = -0.22; 95% CI: -0.51 to 0.07, I
conclusionOur meta-analysis found that RNFL thickness as a whole or by individual quadrants was not significantly different between ALS patients and controls while the inner nuclear layer (INL) was substantially thinner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.