Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35996125›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

RealTalk evidence-based communication training resources: development of conversation analysis-based materials to support training in end-of-life-related health and social care conversations.

Ruth Parry, Becky Whittaker, Marco Pino, Laura Jenkins, Esme Worthington, Christina Faull

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Developing a Card Game for Assessment and Intervention in the Person and the Family in Palliative Care: "International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth ParryCentre for Research in Communication and Culture, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK. r.parry@lboro.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4909-440X
Becky WhittakerCentre for Research in Communication and Culture, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
Marco PinoCentre for Research in Communication and Culture, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1571-5028
Laura JenkinsCentre for Research in Communication and Culture, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5594-4477
Esme WorthingtonCentre for Research in Communication and Culture, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1101-3419
Christina FaullLOROS Hospice Leicester, University Hospitals of Leicester and Honorary Professor University of Leicester, Leicester, LE3 9QE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0064-8056
Loughborough University · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Health Foundation RU33/GIFTS 7210National Institute for Health Research CDF-2014-07-046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training to enhance healthcare practitioners' capabilities in engaging people in sensitive and end-of life-related conversations is in demand. However, evaluations have either not measured, or found very limited impact on actual practice and patient experience. Training effectiveness is improved when it is based on in-depth evidence, reflects the complexity of real-life interactions, and instils principles adaptable to everyday practice. A relatively new source of in-depth evidence and practice-relevant insights on healthcare interactions is conversation analytic research, a form of observational analysis of real-life interactions. However, conversation analytic research findings have largely been disseminated by and for scientists, rather than clinicians and trainers. We used conversation analytic evidence to develop resources for use by healthcare trainers. The aim was to increase training's evidence-base and authenticity. We further aimed to develop resources applicable to working with learners ranging from novices to advanced practitioners.

methodsUsing an intervention development approach, we created online video-clips and supplementary written materials for professionals who deliver training, supervision, and support in healthcare communication for staff and students. The materials were reviewed by an advisory group comprising clinicians, lay consultees, educators, and researchers, and piloted by trainers in UK universities, NHS organisations and independent hospices. We refined materials based on their feedback.

resultsThe resulting 'RealTalk' resources focus on practices for communicating with patients and their companions about end-of-life and prognosis. Two core training modules were developed, each comprising several patient case studies featuring video-clips from real-life healthcare consultations. The clips featured practices that patients and experienced practitioners use in approaching end-of-life matters. The case studies also included evidence-based descriptions of observable practices and the principles underlying these, alongside transcripts and case synopses.

conclusionsRealTalk training resources aim to facilitate evidence-based, experiential and reflective learning, focusing on communication challenges, practices and principles for end-of-life-related interactions. The resources are designed for use by trainers for delivering all levels of training, from introductory to advanced, in both formal and informal training settings. Our development process may serve as a blueprint for the production of future evidence-based training resources based on conversation analytic research.

Indexed as

CommunicationDelivery of Health CareClinical CompetenceDeathHumansSocial SupportCommunication trainingConversation analysisEducationEnd-of-life careHealth occupationsIntervention developmentPalliative careTeachingVideo recording

Identifiers

PMID35996125
PMCPMC9395846
OpenAlexW4292985941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.