Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35996092›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Longitudinal changes of mental health problems in children and adolescents treated in a primary care-based health-coaching programme - results of the PrimA-QuO cohort study.

Siona Decke, Karina Hamacher, Martin Lang, Otto Laub, Lars Schwettmann, Ralf Strobl, Eva Grill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Siona DeckeInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology - IBE, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. siona.decke@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Karina HamacherBKK Vertragsarbeitsgemeinschaft Bayern, Munich, Germany.
Martin LangBerufsverband der Kinder- und Jugendärzte (BVKJ) e.V., Cologne, Germany.
Otto LaubPaedNetz Bayern e.V., Munich, Germany.
Lars SchwettmannInstitute of Health Economics and Health Care Management (IGM), Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Ralf StroblInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology - IBE, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eva GrillInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology - IBE, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bayer (Germany) · DEGerman Center for Lung Research · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, 19.1% of boys and 14.5% of girls are affected by mental health problems (MHP). Paediatricians are usually the first in line to be contacted but they often do not feel adequately trained to diagnose and treat MHP in primary care. A major statutory health insurance fund introduced a health coaching (HC) programme to strengthen primary care consultation for MHP. The HC includes a training concept for paediatricians, standardised guidelines for actions and additional payments. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential effects of the HC programme on the change of MHP in children and adolescents.

methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted in Bavaria, Germany, in 2018 and 2019. Data were collected at 2 points 1 year apart using an online questionnaire. Parents of patients with developmental disorder of speech and language, head/abdominal pain, conduct disorder or non-organic enuresis were approached by their health insurance. Families treated according to the HC programme form the intervention group while all others serve as controls. MHP was assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) as a child self-assessment (SDQ-S)/or external assessment by parents (SDQ-P). Determinants of SDQ total score were analysed using linear mixed effects models.

resultsCross-sectional (n = 1090) and longitudinal analyses (n = 599) were performed. At baseline, a total of 23.5% had an SDQ total score "at risk" (SDQ-S > 15/SDQ-P > 13). There were no significant differences between intervention and controls. After full adjustment for all potential confounders, higher SDQ scores indicating more problems were significantly associated with male sex (2.000, p < 0.001) whereas a high parental education level was significantly associated with decreased SDQ scores (-2.127, p =0.034). There was a significant improvement in the control group over time (-0.814, p = 0.001) while the SDQ scores in the intervention group remained stable (-0.012, p = 0.020).

conclusionThis evaluation of the HC programme could not prove a clinically relevant intervention's effect on the MHP developmental course. Nevertheless, (HC) paediatricians have crucial potential to improve the care of MHP patients. Targeting families with less access to support measures might help reduce the burden of MHP and be a step towards continuous improvement of care.

Indexed as

Conduct DisorderMentoringAdolescentChildCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesChildren and AdolescentsCohort StudyHealth Coaching ProgrammeMental Health ProblemsPaediatrician

Identifiers

PMID35996092
PMCPMC9396915
OpenAlexW4292648207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.