ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023
A history of cesarean section and future maternal long-term risk for neoplasms: a population-based cohort study.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining the relationship between cesarean section scar and endometrial cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Association of cesarean section with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMode of delivery has long-term implications on the mother, including recent data regarding the level of transmission of fetal microchimeric cells (FMc) and their possible effect on cancer development. We aimed to evaluate the association between cesarean section (CS) and future risk for neoplasms. STUDY
designA population-based cohort analysis comparing the long-term risk for neoplasms between patients that delivered only by CS to those that delivered only vaginally (VD). Neoplasms were pre-defined based on ICD-9 codes. Deliveries occurred between the years 1991-2017 in a tertiary medical center. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the cumulative incidence of neoplasms and Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to control for confounders.
resultsDuring the study period 105,992 patients met the inclusion criteria; 14150 (13.4%) of patients had only CS and 91842 (86.6%) had VD (comparison group). The CS group had significantly higher incidence of benign and malignant neoplasms (4.73 per 1000 patient-years versus 3.88 per 1000 patient-years, OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.16-1.37; p = 0.001; 2.19 per 1000 patient-years of follow up versus 1.93 per 1000 patient-years, OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31; p = 0.013). Specifically, the CS group had higher incidence of uterine cancer (1.2 versus 0.06 per 1000 patient-years, OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.14-3.39; p = 0.013). The cumulative incidence of benign, malignant and uterine neoplasms was significantly higher in the CS group (Log rank test p = 0.001; 0.036 and 0.014; respectively). Importantly, no significant association was found with breast and ovarian malignancies." When performing a Cox regression model controlling for confounders, the risk for malignancy-related hospitalizations remained significant (adjusted HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.48; p = 0.031) but not for uterine cancer (adjusted HR = 1.6, 95% CI 0.9-2.8; p = 0.103).
conclusionOur findings provide support to linkage between delivery by cesarean section and future maternal malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.