Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35995958›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Personality similarity predicts synchronous neural responses in fMRI and EEG data.

Sandra C Matz, Ryan Hyon, Elisa C Baek, Carolyn Parkinson, Moran Cerf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Promoting Social Connectedness Through Interbrain Neurofeedback.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dyadic Person Similarity Predicts Similarity in Face Judgements.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Synchrony Across Brains.Annual review of psychology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandra C MatzColumbia Business School, Columbia University, 3022 Broadway, New York, 10027, USA. sm4409@gsb.columbia.edu.
Ryan HyonUCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Elisa C BaekUCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Carolyn Parkinson *UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Moran Cerf *Northwestern University, Evanston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful communication and cooperation among different members of society depends, in part, on a consistent understanding of the physical and social world. What drives this alignment in perspectives? We present evidence from two neuroimaging studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; N = 66 with 2145 dyadic comparisons) and electroencephalography (EEG; N = 225 with 25,200 dyadic comparisons) to show that: (1) the extent to which people's neural responses are synchronized when viewing naturalistic stimuli is related to their personality profiles, and (2) that this effect is stronger than that of similarity in gender, ethnicity and political affiliation. The localization of the fMRI results in combination with the additional eye tracking analyses suggest that the relationship between personality similarity and neural synchrony likely reflects alignment in the interpretation of stimuli and not alignment in overt visual attention. Together, the findings suggest that similarity in psychological dispositions aligns people's reality via shared interpretations of the external world.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainBrain MappingHumansPersonality

Identifiers

PMID35995958
PMCPMC9395427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.