Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35995943›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Improved correspondence of fMRI visual field localizer data after cortex-based macroanatomical alignment.

Mishal Qubad, Catherine V Barnes-Scheufler, Michael Schaum, Eva Raspor, Lara Rösler, Benjamin Peters, Carmen Schiweck, Rainer Goebel, Andreas Reif, Robert A Bittner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mishal QubadDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy and Brain Imaging Center, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9291-5739
Catherine V Barnes-ScheuflerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy and Brain Imaging Center, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4730-1981
Michael SchaumLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6589-4530
Eva RasporDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy and Brain Imaging Center, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4418-7084
Lara RöslerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy and Brain Imaging Center, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1046-1073
Benjamin PetersInstitute of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0948-8976
Carmen SchiweckDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy and Brain Imaging Center, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4215-0448
Rainer GoebelNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1780-2467
Andreas ReifDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy and Brain Imaging Center, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0992-634X
Robert A BittnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy and Brain Imaging Center, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. robert.bittner@med.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2021-0358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the visual system with fMRI often requires using localizer paradigms to define regions of interest (ROIs). However, the considerable interindividual variability of the cerebral cortex represents a crucial confound for group-level analyses. Cortex-based alignment (CBA) techniques reliably reduce interindividual macroanatomical variability. Yet, their utility has not been assessed for visual field localizer paradigms, which map specific parts of the visual field within retinotopically organized visual areas. We evaluated CBA for an attention-enhanced visual field localizer, mapping homologous parts of each visual quadrant in 50 participants. We compared CBA with volume-based alignment and a surface-based analysis, which did not include macroanatomical alignment. CBA led to the strongest increase in the probability of activation overlap (up to 86%). At the group level, CBA led to the most consistent increase in ROI size while preserving vertical ROI symmetry. Overall, our results indicate that in addition to the increased signal-to-noise ratio of a surface-based analysis, macroanatomical alignment considerably improves statistical power. These findings confirm and extend the utility of CBA for the study of the visual system in the context of group analyses. CBA should be particularly relevant when studying neuropsychiatric disorders with abnormally increased interindividual macroanatomical variability.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingCerebral CortexHumansProbabilityVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID35995943
PMCPMC9395433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.