Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35995909›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2022

Antibacterial Property and Metagenomic Analysis of Milk Kefir.

Siqing Liu, Shao-Yeh Lu, Nasib Qureshi, Hesham A El Enshasy, Chris D Skory

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Siqing LiuAgricultural Research Service, Renewable Product Technology Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, USDA, 1815 N University St, Peoria, IL, 61604, USA. Siqing.liu@usda.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-5301-9050
Shao-Yeh LuAgricultural Research Service, Renewable Product Technology Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, USDA, 1815 N University St, Peoria, IL, 61604, USA.
Nasib QureshiBioenergy Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, USDA, 1815 N University St, Peoria, IL, 61604, USA.
Hesham A El EnshasyInstitute of Bioproduct Development (IBD), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
Chris D SkoryAgricultural Research Service, Renewable Product Technology Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, USDA, 1815 N University St, Peoria, IL, 61604, USA.
Agricultural Research Service · USCity of Scientific Research and Technological Applications · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Milk kefir fermentation has been used in households for generations. Consumption of milk kefir has been associated with various health benefits, presumably from the probiotics of yeast and bacteria that make up the kefir grains. In addition, many of the microbes are known to produce novel antimicrobial compounds that can be used for other applications. The microbes living inside kefir grains differ significantly depending on geographical location and production methods. In this study, we aimed to use metagenomic analysis of fermented milk by using three different kefir grains (kefir 1, kefir 2, and kefir 3) from different US sources. We analyzed the microbial compositions of the three milk fermentation samples. This study revealed that each sample contains unique and distinct groups of microbes, kefir 1 showed the least diversity, and kefir 3 showed the highest diversity. Kefir 3 is rich in Proteobacteria while kefir 2 is dominated by the Firmicutes. Using bacterial indicator growth analyses carried out by continuous readings from microplate-based bioreactor assays suggested that kefir 2 fermentation filtrate has higher antibacterial property. We have screened 30 purified cultures of kefir 2 sample and isolated two lactic acid bacteria strains with higher antibacterial activities; the two strains were identified as Leuconostoc mesenteroides 28-1 and Lentilactobacillus kefiri 25-2 by 16S genomic PCR with confirmed antibacterial activities of fermentation filtrate after growing under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Indexed as

Cultured Milk ProductsKefirLactobacillalesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFermentationMilkAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibacterial activitiesKefirMetagenomicsMicrobial diversityMilk fermentation

Identifiers

PMID35995909
OpenAlexW4292651745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.