Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35995894›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2022

Patient Preferences in the Management of Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Conjoint Analysis.

Adrian Skelly, Nicholas Taylor, Christina Fasser, Jean-Pierre Malkowski, Pushpendra Goswami, Louise Downey

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Measuring patient activation: the utility of the Patient Activation Measure administered in an interview setting.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adrian SkellyNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. adrian.skelly@novartis.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4076-8607
Nicholas TaylorInpharmation, Stokenchurch, UK.
Christina FasserRetina International, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jean-Pierre MalkowskiNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Pushpendra GoswamiNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Louise DowneyHull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHHull Royal Infirmary · GBMundipharma (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo identify patient preference drivers related to the management of wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD).

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, a self-explicated 'conjoint analysis' survey was administered online to eligible patients with wet AMD (receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] treatment for at least 12 months) from the USA, Canada, UK, France, Spain, Germany, Italy, Japan, Taiwan, and Australia. The survey consisted of six domains with 21 attributes, which were selected on the basis of a literature review, social media listening, and tele-interviews/discussions with patients, clinical experts, and patient groups. Utility and relative importance scores were generated for each attribute and utility difference significance testing was performed using 'unequal variances t tests'. The Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) questionnaire was administered to assess patients' knowledge, skill, and confidence in self-management.

resultsA total of 466 patients (mean age, 68 years; women, 54%; binocular wet AMD, 28%) with an average anti-VEGF treatment duration of 3.9 years completed the survey. The most important preference domains were 'treatment effects on vision' (non-significant) and 'vision-related symptom burdens' (p < 0.001), followed by 'treatment risk' (p < 0.05), 'impact on daily activities' (p < 0.05), 'burden of clinic/hospital visits' (p < 0.001), and 'impact on psychological well-being'. The five most important attributes in order of importance were clarity of vision, treatment effect on symptoms, quality of vision, time to treatment effect, and time to re-administration. The two most important attributes globally were also in the top three attributes across countries. The majority of participants in the study were level 3 or level 4 of the PAM-13 questionnaire.

conclusionsThis study identified the most important disease and treatment attributes to patients using patient-centred methods. The data showed the degree of harmonization of preferences across geographies and that participants actively adopt behaviours required for improved treatment outcomes. The identified preference drivers may inform future clinical development.

Indexed as

RanibizumabWet Macular DegenerationAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsPatient PreferenceVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth FactorsAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth FactorsConjoint surveyNeovascular age-related macular degenerationPatient activation measure (PAM)Patient preferencePreference driversTreatment adherence

Identifiers

PMID35995894
PMCPMC9464751
OpenAlexW4292656895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.