Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35995858›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of impotence research2024

Conservative and medical treatments of non-sickle cell disease-related ischemic priapism: a systematic review by the EAU Sexual and Reproductive Health Panel.

Paolo Capogrosso, Kostas Dimitropolous, Giorgio Ivan Russo, Tharu Tharakan, Uros Milenkovic, Andrea Cocci, Luca Boeri, Murat Gül, Carlo Bettocchi, Joana Carvalho and 12 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of impotence research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Priapism in the paediatric and adolescent population.International journal of impotence research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.

Paolo CapogrossoDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Ospedale di Circolo and Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2347-9504
Kostas DimitropolousAcademic Urology Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Giorgio Ivan RussoUrology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-7353
Tharu TharakanDepartment of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK.
Uros MilenkovicDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Andrea CocciDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urologic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-6294
Luca BoeriDepartment of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0040-784X
Murat GülSchool of Medicine, Department of Urology, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6657-6227
Carlo BettocchiDepartment of Urology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Joana CarvalhoCPUP: Center for Psychology of Porto University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Porto University, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2362-0010
Arif KalkanlıDepartment of Urology, Taksim Training & Research Hospital, Instanbul, Turkey.
Giovanni CoronaEndocrinology Unit, Medical Department, Maggiore-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-2885
Georgios HatzichristodoulouDepartment of Urology, Martha-Maria Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3170-7362
Hugh T JonesCentre for Diabetes and Endocrinology, Barnsley Hospital NHS Trust, Barnsley, UK.
Ates KadiogluDepartment of Urology, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Juan Ignacio Martinez-SalamancaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda. Lyx Institute of Urology. Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Vaibhav ModgilManchester Andrology Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Ege Can SerefogluDepartment of Urology, Biruni University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2530-7012
Paolo VerzeDepartment of Medicine and Surgery "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Fisciano, Campania, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-8227
Andrea Salonia *Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. salonia.andrea@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-7165
Suks Minhas *Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK.
EAU Working Group on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Charing Cross Hospital · GBBarnsley Hospital · GBBiruni University · TRIstanbul University · TRKU Leuven · BEManchester Royal Infirmary · GBMartha-Maria Hospital · DEOspedale Bellaria · ITOspedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi · ITSelçuk University · TRTaksim German Hospital · TRUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Salerno · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservative and medical treatments are considered the first step in ischemic priapism (IP) management, although there is no clear evidence regarding their efficacy. We conducted a systematic review on behalf of the EAU Guidelines panel on Sexual and Reproductive health to analyse the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of conservative and medical treatment for non-sickle cell disease-related IP. Databases searched for relevant literature investigating efficacy and safety of conservative measures and medical treatment for IP included Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Libraries and clinicaltrial.gov published up to September 2021. Overall, 41 retrospective, 3 prospective single-arm studies and 3 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Intracavernous injection with sympathomimetic (ICIs) agents were the most frequently utilized treatment with efficacy ranging from 0 to 100% of cases. The combination of ICIs with corporeal aspiration with or without irrigation with saline was successful in 70 to 100% of cases. Oral treatment with β2 receptor agonist (e.g., terbutaline) showed mild to moderate efficacy. Conservative methods including ice pack, exercise, cold enema and ejaculation depicted lower effectiveness in resolving priapism (1-55%). Longer time interval from the onset to the resolution of IP was associated with higher rate of erectile dysfunction at follow-up (30-70%), especially after 24 h.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPriapismHumansMaleProspective StudiesReproductive HealthRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35995858
OpenAlexW4292553539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.