ArticleScientific reports2022
Four-copy number alteration (CNA)-related lncRNA prognostic signature for liver cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Multi-omics approach for identifying CNV-associated lncRNA signatures with prognostic value in prostate cancer.Non-coding RNA research · 2024Article
- Vesicle-mediated transport-related genes predict the prognosis and immune microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Multi-Omics Mining of lncRNAs with Biological and Clinical Relevance in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify CNA-related lncRNAs that can better evaluate the prognosis of patients with liver cancer. Prognostic molecular subtypes were identified, followed by tumor mutation and differential expression analyses. Genomic copy number anomalies and their association with lncRNAs were also evaluated. A risk model was built based on lncRNAs, as well as a nomogram, and the differences in the tumor immune microenvironment and drug sensitivity between the High_ and Low_risk groups were compared. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis was used to identify modules with significant enrichment in prognostic-related lncRNAs. In total, two subtypes were identified, TP53 and CTNNB1 were common high-frequency mutated genes in the two subtypes. A total of 8,372 differentially expressed (DE) mRNAs and 798 DElncRNAs were identified between cluster1 and cluster2. In addition, a four-lncRNA signature was constructed, and statistically significant differences between the Low_ and High_risk groups were found in terms of CD8 T cells, resting memory CD4 T cells, etc. Enrichment analysis showed that prognostic-related lncRNAs were involved in the cell cycle, p53 signaling pathway, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, etc. A prognostic prediction signature, based on four-CNA-related lncRNAs, could contribute to a more accurate prognosis of patients with liver cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.