Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35995576›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2022

Factors influencing symptom appraisal and help-seeking of older adults with possible cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Daniel Jones, Erica Di Martino, Stephen H Bradley, Blessing Essang, Scott Hemphill, Judy M Wright, Cristina Renzi, Claire Surr, Andrew Clegg, Richard Neal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient preferences for investigating cancer-related symptoms in Australian general practice: a discrete-choice experiment.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Patterns and predictors of symptom burden and posttraumatic growth among patients with cancer: a latent profile analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Symptom appraisal and help seeking in males with symptoms of possible prostate cancer: a qualitative study with an ethnically diverse sample in London.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel JonesLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3833-6055
Erica Di MartinoLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds.
Stephen H BradleyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2038-2056
Blessing EssangLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds.
Scott HemphillLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds.
Judy M WrightLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds.
Cristina RenziUniversity College London, London.
Claire SurrLeeds Beckett University, Leeds.
Andrew CleggAcademic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds.
Richard NealSchool of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3544-2744
University of Leeds · GBLeeds Beckett University · GBThe London College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cancer burden falls predominantly on older (≥65 years) adults. Prompt presentation to primary care with cancer symptoms could result in earlier diagnosis. However, patient symptom appraisal and help-seeking decisions involving cancer symptoms are complex and may be further complicated in older adults.

aimTo explore the effect of older age on patients' appraisal of possible cancer symptoms and their decision to seek help for these symptoms. DESIGN AND

settingMixed-methods systematic review.

methodMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, ASSIA, the ISRCTN registry, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence were searched for studies on symptom appraisal and help-seeking decisions for cancer symptoms by adults aged ≥65 years. Studies were analysed using thematic synthesis and according to the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis guidelines.

resultsEighty studies were included with a total of 32 995 participants. Studies suggested a possible association between increasing age and prolonged symptom appraisal interval. Reduced knowledge of cancer symptoms and differences in symptom interpretation may contribute to this prolonged interval. In contrast, in the current study a possible association was found between increasing age and prompt help-seeking. Themes affecting help-seeking in older adults included the influence of family and carers, competing priorities, fear, embarrassment, fatalism, comorbidities, a desire to avoid doctors, a perceived need to not waste doctors' time, and patient self-management of symptoms.

conclusionThis review suggests that increasing age is associated with delayed cancer symptom appraisal. When symptoms are recognised as potentially serious, increasing age was associated with prompt help-seeking although other factors could prolong this. Policymakers, charities, and GPs should aim to ensure older adults are able to recognise potential symptoms of cancer and seek help promptly.

Indexed as

early detection of cancerfrail elderlyprimary health caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35995576
PMCPMC9423047
OpenAlexW4283014675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.