Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35995410›Full record

ReviewAcademic pediatrics

Beyond Vaccination Coverage: Population-Based Measurement of Early Childhood Immunization Schedule Adherence.

Sophia R Newcomer, Jason M Glanz, Matthew F Daley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophia R NewcomerUniversity of Montana School of Public and Community Health Sciences (SR Newcomer), Missoula, Mont; University of Montana Center for Population Health Research (SR Newcomer), Missoula, Mont. Electronic address: sophia.newcomer@umontana.edu.
Jason M GlanzKaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research (JM Glanz, MF Daley), Aurora, Colo; University of Colorado, Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology (JM Glanz), Aurora, Colo.
Matthew F DaleyKaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research (JM Glanz, MF Daley), Aurora, Colo; University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics (MF Daley), Aurora, Colo.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

Wildfires and Cardiovascular Health: Evaluating Associations and Intervention StrategiesP20GM130418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI Ethan Sheppard Walker · 2020 to 2026
$17.9M
Population-level assessment of early childhood vaccination timeliness, parental vaccine hesitancy, and immunization schedule adherence in the United States, including rural-urban disparitiesR01AI165768 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI NEWCOMER, SOPHIA RAFF · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI165768NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immunization schedule recommended by the U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) provides a structure for how 10 different vaccine series should be administered to children in the first 18 months of life. Progress toward US early childhood immunization goals has largely focused on measuring vaccination coverage at age 24 months. However, standard vaccination coverage measures do not reflect whether children received vaccine doses by recommended ages, or whether vaccines were given concomitantly, per the schedule. In this paper, we describe innovations in population-level measurement of immunization schedule adherence through quantifying vaccination timeliness and undervaccination patterns. Measuring vaccination timeliness involves comparing when children received vaccine doses relative to ACIP age recommendations. To assess undervaccination patterns, children's vaccination histories are analyzed to determine whether they were vaccinated consistent with the ACIP schedule. Some patterns, such as spreading out vaccines across visits, are indicative of parental hesitancy. Other patterns, such as starting all recommended series but missing doses, are largely indicative of other immunization services delivery challenges. Since 2003, at least 12 studies have used National Immunization Survey-Child, immunization information system, or integrated health plan data to measure vaccination timeliness or undervaccination patterns at national or state levels. Moving forward, these novel measures can be leveraged for population-based surveillance of vaccine confidence, and for distinguishing undervaccination due to parental vaccine hesitancy from undervaccination due to other causes. Broader adoption of these measures can facilitate identification of targeted strategies for improving timely and routine early childhood vaccination uptake across the United States.

Indexed as

Vaccination CoverageVaccinesChild, PreschoolHumansImmunization ProgramsImmunization ScheduleInfantUnited StatesVaccinationVaccinesimmunization schedulevaccines, vaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35995410
PMCPMC10253042
OpenAlexW4295804460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.