Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35995368›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2022

Participation in obstetrical studies is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes.

Gabriella D Cozzi, Victoria C Jauk, Jeff M Szychowski, Alan T Tita, Ashley N Battarbee, Akila Subramaniam

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Gabriella D CozziCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Dr Cozzi, Ms Jauk, and Drs Szychowski, Tita, Battarbee, and Subramaniam); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs Cozzi, Szychowski, Tita, Battarbee, and Subramaniam). Electronic address: gabriellacozzi@uabmc.edu.
Victoria C JaukCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Dr Cozzi, Ms Jauk, and Drs Szychowski, Tita, Battarbee, and Subramaniam).
Jeff M SzychowskiCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Dr Cozzi, Ms Jauk, and Drs Szychowski, Tita, Battarbee, and Subramaniam); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs Cozzi, Szychowski, Tita, Battarbee, and Subramaniam); Biostatistics (Dr Szychowski), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Alan T TitaCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Dr Cozzi, Ms Jauk, and Drs Szychowski, Tita, Battarbee, and Subramaniam); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs Cozzi, Szychowski, Tita, Battarbee, and Subramaniam).
Ashley N BattarbeeCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Dr Cozzi, Ms Jauk, and Drs Szychowski, Tita, Battarbee, and Subramaniam); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs Cozzi, Szychowski, Tita, Battarbee, and Subramaniam).
Akila SubramaniamCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Dr Cozzi, Ms Jauk, and Drs Szychowski, Tita, Battarbee, and Subramaniam); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs Cozzi, Szychowski, Tita, Battarbee, and Subramaniam).
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Close the GAP: Glycemic control after Antenatal corticosteroids in women with Pregestational diabetesK23HD103875 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BATTARBEE, ASHLEY NICOLE · 2021 to 2025
$826k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD103875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between pregnant patients participating in obstetrical studies and pregnancy outcomes is understudied.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the association between participation in obstetrical studies and maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY

designThis was a retrospective cohort study of all patients delivering at a single center from 2013 to 2018. Patients with pregnancy loss at <13 weeks of gestation or major fetal anomalies were excluded. Patients who enrolled in one or more obstetrical studies were categorized as "study participants" and were compared with patients who did not enroll in an obstetrical study, that is, "study nonparticipants." The primary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity diagnosed up to 6 weeks after delivery. The secondary outcomes included composite neonatal morbidity and other perinatal outcomes. Bivariate analyses compared baseline demographics and outcomes between groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses by study design (trial or observational) were planned.

resultsOf 19,569 patients included in this analysis, 3848 (19.7%) were study participants, and 15,721 (80.3%) were study nonparticipants. Among study participants, 3023 (78.6%) enrolled in a trial, and 825 (21.4%) enrolled in an observational study. The study participants had higher body mass index and were more likely to be younger, non-Hispanic Black, publicly insured, nulliparous, and undergo cesarean delivery than study nonparticipants. Compared with study nonparticipants, the study participants had significantly lower odds of composite maternal morbidity (9.2% vs 8.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.95) and composite neonatal morbidity (27.5% vs 18.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.58). In addition, the odds of fetal death, 5-minute Apgar score of <5, neonatal death, maternal and neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and lengths of stay were lower for study participants than for study nonparticipants. In stratified analyses, maternal morbidity was only significantly decreased among trial participants; however, there was a significantly reduced odds of neonatal morbidity, regardless of study design (trial or observational vs no study).

conclusionParticipation in obstetrical studies was associated with decreased maternal and neonatal morbidities after adjusting for potential confounders. This underscored the importance of pregnant patients enrolling in obstetrical clinical studies and potentially benefiting from the additional surveillance. Further study of how study participation exerts this effect on pregnancy outcomes is warranted.

Indexed as

ObstetricsPregnancy OutcomeCesarean SectionFemaleFetal DeathHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective Studiescesarean deliveryfetal deathmaternal deathmaternal intensive care unit admissionneonatal deathobservational studyobstetrical trialpostpartum readmission

Identifiers

PMID35995368
PMCPMC10577523
OpenAlexW4295213573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.