Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35995103›Full record

Trial reportPreventive medicine2022

Preliminary evidence on cigarette nicotine reduction with concurrent access to an e-cigarette: Manipulating cigarette nicotine content, e-liquid nicotine content, and e-liquid flavor availability.

Cassidy M White, Katelyn M Tessier, Joseph S Koopmeiners, Rachel L Denlinger-Apte, Caroline O Cobb, Tonya Lane, Claudia L Campos, John G Spangler, Dorothy K Hatsukami, Andrew A Strasser and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. E-Liquid Flavor Availability Significantly Affects Cigarette and E-Liquid Purchasing in an Experimental Marketplace Simulating a Low Nicotine Product Standard.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes and Nicotine Vaping Device Characteristics on Choices to Smoke, Vape, or Abstain in Early Young Adults.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cassidy M WhiteDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. Electronic address: cawhite@wakehealth.edu.
Katelyn M TessierMasonic Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Joseph S KoopmeinersDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Rachel L Denlinger-ApteDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Caroline O CobbDepartment of Psychology and Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Tonya LaneDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Claudia L CamposDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
John G SpanglerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Dorothy K HatsukamiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Andrew A StrasserDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eric C DonnyDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
VERY LOW NICOTINE CIGARETTES IN SMOKERS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIAU54DA031659 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI COLBY, SUZANNE M · 2011 to 2022
$64.7M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Project 4: Using a prospective cohort survey to test population-level predictions generated by Projects 1-3U54DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI FAGAN, PEBBLES · 2018 to 2022
$20.8M
The effect of context on the importance of nicotine-content in choices between cigarettes and e-cigarettesR36DA054481 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WHITE, CASSIDY MEGAN · 2021 to 2022
$107k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NIDA NIH HHS R36 DA054481NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA031659NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reinforcing characteristics of e-cigarettes could moderate the impact of reducing cigarette nicotine content. In this study, people who smoke daily were recruited from North Carolina and Pennsylvania (US) in 2018 and 2019. Within a randomized 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design, participants received investigational cigarettes and an e-cigarette for 12 weeks. Cigarette nicotine content was very low (0.4 mg/g of tobacco; VLNC) or normal (15.8 mg/g; NNC). E-liquids were 0.3% ("low") or 1.8% ("moderate") freebase nicotine, and available in tobacco flavors or tobacco, fruit, dessert and mint flavors. Study recruitment concluded before reaching the planned sample size (N = 480). Fifty participants were randomized and 32 completed the study. We found that randomization to VLNC, relative to NNC cigarettes, reduced self-reported cigarettes per day (CPD; mean difference: -12.96; 95% CI: -21.51, -4.41; p = 0.005); whereas e-liquid nicotine content and flavor availability did not have significant effects. The effect of cigarette nicotine content was larger in the moderate vs. low nicotine e-liquid groups and in the all flavors versus tobacco flavors e-liquid groups; tests of the interaction between e-liquid characteristics and cigarette nicotine content were not significant. Biomarkers of smoke exposure at Week 12 did not differ across conditions, which may reflect variability in adherence to only using VLNC cigarettes. In conclusion this study offers preliminary evidence that the extent to which cigarette nicotine reduction decreases smoking may depend on the reinforcing characteristics of alternative products, including the available nicotine contents and flavors of e-cigarettes.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsBiomarkersHumansNicotineTobacco UseBiomarkersNicotineAlternative nicotine delivery systemsCigarette nicotine reductionE-cigarettesElectronic nicotine delivery systemsTobacco regulatory scienceVery low nicotine content cigarettes

Identifiers

PMID35995103
PMCPMC10080461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.